Comments by nay
Page 1 of 2 | Next
Posted on January 4 at 11:22 p.m.
To MelissaE: MY comment to you is, If you have strong feelings about hunting in a lawful manner then you would understand where these people are coming from!!!!! If you don't have an opinion and don't like the nastiness..... Don't read these comments! People feel strongly about things like this, as they SHOULD. Weren't you the one yesterday that was off topic & trying to hook up with rbradford? That was WRONG! Go to the personals.....
Posted on January 4 at 8:28 p.m.
To kansascop: You are "RIGHT ON" with Kent being remorseful because he got caught, key word being "CAUGHT".He didn't surrender! And to emporian: Good for you bringing up the disability permit, I did that, with no avail. Maybe "afriend" can clear that up for us! And by the way, I still don't believe there was a coyote!!!!!!!!
Posted on January 4 at 6:51 p.m.
I think if I was the person "afriend" I wouldn't be admitting it on here.
Posted on January 4 at 11:40 a.m.
Some one mentioned being about 14 inches off the ground at their highest point in their layout blind. OKAY, if this situation is similar then a coyote stands some what higher than 14 inches!!!!!! Still don't add up! There was NO coyote!
Well huntered, how ya gonna explain that one?
Better yet, DON"T!
Posted on January 4 at 10:02 a.m.
Well said Hillbilly!! As far as him being a hunters ed teacher, if ya look real close hell he can't even spell correctly. Thats what the preview comment button is for. I'm really also having a problem with him defending Kent, I still think the WHOLE story sounds a little FISHY!
My heart really goes out to the Arndt family, I couldn't be as forgiving.
Posted on January 4 at 6:42 a.m.
Did you read those charges? #1,2,3 ????
He wasn't out there to shoot coyotes.................
Unlawful method method of taking wildlife.
Kinda says it all!!!!!!
Posted on January 3 at 9:33 p.m.
Before I go,If he is disabled, he should have a permit for that, therefore he wouldn't also be charged with,
1. Criminal hunting
2. Criminal Discharge of a fire arm
3.Attempted USE of an UNLAWFUL METHOD of taking wildlife
Let's get our "facts" straight!!!!!
Posted on January 3 at 9:20 p.m.
Are you actually telling me that you think it's legal to hunt from a moving vehicle??? I'm going to say this one more time.....It is not only Illegal but it's not Ethical!! If you require more information on Ethical Hunting Please contact this # 1-877-426-3843.
Posted on January 3 at 2:55 p.m.
I'm aware of all of this, but I don't think he's a "real" man because he would have been hunting LEGALLY and whose to say that he even had a license to begin with? He sounds like some MORON just out looking for something to shoot and therefor this awful thing happened! And if I'm correct, everyone IN the vehicle should have had license's, also if they were there & knew that he was road hunting (which they did) what charges are they looking at?
Page 1 of 2 | Next
Posted on January 5 at 12:41 a.m.
melissaE: YOU were the one that said YOU were "totally off topic" and just wanted to say "hi". Well you were off topic and I think that is disrespectful considering the discussion that is taking place HERE. If you don't have anything to contribute about this topic, save it!!!!! GET OVER YOURSELF!!!
By the way, I DO think some people are better than others,especially the ones that HUNT LEGALLY....
On Charges filed in shooting death