Comments by anonymous1
Page 1 of 1
Posted on May 8 at 3:30 p.m.
Sorry the typo, that last comment was directed to "slrnblck"
Posted on May 8 at 3:27 p.m.
skrbvkcj:
Do you know if it is regular hospital policy to advise patients and family members -- presumably upon admittance -- that if they have any problems, complaints, etc. during or about their stay at the hospital, whether with nurses, doctors, etc., that they can contact the quality department, told where the department is in the hospital, what the telephone number is and who to speak to?
Posted on May 8 at 11:36 a.m.
Has Fred Harder or anyone else from the hospital's Board of Trustees personally talked to ALL of the doctors who have left, like Dr. Kosko, Dr. Amend, Dr. Lloyd, about why they left? I'm not talking about getting a rubber stamped report from the hospital administration, I'm talking about personally speaking to the doctors to find out all of the reasons they chose to leave Emporia.
Posted on May 8 at 11:33 a.m.
The only way this whole mess is going to be resolved is to hire an independent third person to investigate not only the doctors' complaints, but also who is responsible for the $900,000 hospital loss.
Posted on May 7 at 4:53 p.m.
As President of the hospital's board of trustees, will Mr. Harder explain why the hospital filed its claim too late against the contractor that resulted in a loss of $900,000?
Posted on May 3 at 2:42 p.m.
The building was built with bonds issued by the County (my mistake, not City money). It is my understanding that when the Hospital filed their lawsuit against the contractors they filed it too late, and because they filed it too late they (the Hospital) lost the lawsuit and $900,000 of the County's money. Does anyone know why the Hospital filed the lawsuit too late and cost Lyon County taxpayers $900,000?
Posted on May 2 at 11:52 a.m.
I heard that the Hospital LOST $900,000.00 of taxpayers' money in a lawsuit against the contractors of the new addition because the Hospital filed its appeal too late. Will the Board of Trustees address this issue?
Page 1 of 1
Posted on October 13 at 4:26 p.m.
The property that you described has already been zoned commercial by the City. Traffic would come into the property directly from I-35, not past the schools. It makes absolutely no sense to put this large development into a residential zone -- especially when the property has to be rezoned!
On Against proposed development