Comments by Weltha
Page 1 of 22 | Next
Posted on November 25 at 6:44 p.m.
Oh and crack- You never did answer my question.
Again- Explain to their family ie: their children how these illegal drug users are "only hurting themselves" crack
While you are at it please explain to me how that statement is true. Just how "often" does that hold true?
All I got from your post is as long as it only hurts a few you are ok with it. As long as that few isn't you. You think SHS is worse than illegal drug abuse because you don't have to see it. Am I reading wrong? I see from all other of your posts there is no reasoning with you so I will bid you ado. You did help sway me though I must confess. Thanks to you and a couple others like you on here, I have desided that when this issue comes to a vote I will be voting against the ban.
Posted on November 25 at 6:33 p.m.
crack even after your sermon I will have to go with scenerio number 2. Especially when that is what the money was donated to them for anyway not to be the SHS and morality police.
How many smokers run the risk of falling with their child in arm compared to the risk of a drunk or druggie doing the same?
"I understand where you are going with that, but preventing something from happening in someone’s home is much harder (less feasible) than preventing it in public. Even if the drug user is harming his/her family, it is still a smaller population that what is exposed to SHS in public places."
Who desides when the population is "small" enough that you need to quit interfering in someones life?
Posted on November 25 at 3:18 p.m.
crack says- Since these drugs are illegal, drug activity has gone underground; out of the public eye. In other words, you won't have someone blowing marijuana smoke in your face at your favorite restaurant. Often when people are doing drugs, they are only hurting themselves because they have to do it in private.
Explain to their family ie: their children how these illegal drug users are "only hurting themselves" crack
While you are at it please explain to me how that statement is true. Just how "often" does that hold true?
Posted on November 24 at 9:40 a.m.
You hit the proverbial nail on the head there life.
Posted on November 24 at 8:56 a.m.
ok George lol! Just trying to lighten a conversation that is moot any way. Have a great day.
Posted on November 23 at 10:35 a.m.
lol just being funny hear, life but... In your scenario did you stop him (in the middle of being robbed) and ask if he was mexican-american or just just plain mexican?! Was he here legally or not? Chances are if he was robbing you the latter is true.
Posted on November 18 at 8:35 a.m.
Its about time this family gets some kind of closure.
But.... biggest-
"The driver ran the stop sign (a crime, a violation of the law) he did this intentionally and wantonly without the regard for any human life"
Where did you read this at? Has it been proven or did he admit he ran it intentionally? Or are you just speculating? We know he ran it that much is TRUE but on purpose?! I'm just asking because I can't find it any where.
Posted on November 17 at 12:05 p.m.
Yes, great job Clint. crack- leave your smoking comment where it belongs. It sure isn't on this thread. How childish and totally uncalled for.
Posted on November 17 at 9:46 a.m.
mmmm meat.... Thank you to all the farmers and ranchers for their part in feeding my family.
Page 1 of 22 | Next
Posted on November 26 at 10:16 a.m.
I'll bite this time because you made me giggle so, just now..... What does this post have to do with the price of tea in China? It says nothing of my stance on the smoking issue. It only serves the purpose of showing my smart-a$$ side. I was pointing out something that you missed with your post. My post on the other thread said nothing of just recently desiding against the smoking ban either. It mearly states you and others like you are if not all of the reason, atleast part of the reason. I never stated how long ago you did this to me. Don't read to much into things dear. It doesn't help the cause.
On Trailer fire at ESU prompts evacuation of building