Comments by NoMoreMold
Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1
November 21, 2009
| Currently | Sat | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55° |
|
|
|
|
|
| Clear Sky |
58° 39° |
57° 42° |
56° 39° |
48° 36° |
51° 31° |
Advertisement
Advertisement
Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1
Posted on August 21 at 3:44 p.m.
The above, very-well written article tells us that after 50 years of research and posturing, our government agencies cannot agree on something as simple (now) as secondhand smoke being dangerous. The lesson to be learned is that hundreds of thousands of other exposures that are harmful, such as mold and chemicals, are also in the category of "not-agreed upon" by these same government agencies. After Big Tobacco spent huge sums to deny its culpability in selling an addictive product that harmed the health of its users, for a time, the public remained confused, as did the government, on whether smoking was harmful to health. The same thing is occuring with dangerous chemicals and mold, by industries that don't want to be liable. Some of the same scientists-for-hire are going back and forth from working for the government agencies to big business. Visit www.schoolmoldhelp.org to review these topics. Read this article, called ACOEM Expose! http://www.schoolmoldhelp.org/content/vi...
On Hygienist says the science on second-hand smoke not clear