Well, we gotta wonder, besides getting that prom date you hoped for, what is better than having $510 million more to spend in the upcoming legislative session than you thought you’d have when you left Topeka last summer?

Hmmm…not sure…

The Consensus Revenue Estimating Group, as we predicted last week, boosted the state revenue estimate. And now that the state’s budget experts and three university economists have released their estimate — it is $510 million in increased tax revenues for the remainder of this fiscal year and next — we’ll see how good this gets.

Already, we know that about $65 million of that new, or, rather, predicted new money is already spent even before the Legislature convenes. That’s the estimate of how much more the state is going to have to spend this year and next on social services for the state’s poor to provide the services that they get now. That estimate just came in a day before the revenue estimate. Think welfare, foster care, and health care for the state’s poor. Not flashy, not anything that’s going to be a big campaign issue, but a necessary state expenditure from that $510 million.

So, we’re at about $445 million in new spendable cash for the governor and legislators to scrap over.

The unsexy way to use that money? Rebuild the staffing shortages in state agencies that provide Kansans services. Pump more into K-12 education and produce a more valuable workforce for the state. Keep some balance in the State General Fund in case something unexpected happens.

But will that happen? That’s where the fight starts.

Remember, last year Democrat Gov. Laura Kelly vetoed a massive tax-cut bill the Legislature sent her that would have fit into that $445 million with a little room to stretch. Remember? Of course, we didn’t know how much money would be available when she vetoed the bill. Republican legislative leaders essentially said don’t worry, it’ll work out. Well, it did, but we just didn’t know that last year.

So, this upcoming session?

There are several balls in the air. Kelly wants stable finances while she’s in the driver’s seat. Who wants to be captain of a sinking ship — especially because in just three years, she may want to be re-elected?

For the Legislature? That’s where it gets interesting.

Republicans in both chambers basically want sizable tax cuts to help them get re-elected and have lobbyists buy them drinks and meals for the next two years (House) and four years (Senate). They’ll leave it to Kelly to figure out how to keep the state running in the years leading to her re-election.

Besides the tax cuts/fiscal stabilization scrap, it’s also a chance to load up a tax-cut bill that Kelly might feel she has to veto. Who, even Democrats, wants to vote to sustain a veto of a tax-cut bill in an election year?

Oh, and that GOP tax-cut bill can be made very attractive to Democrats. Think a two percent cut in the sales tax on food. Biggest cut ever considered on a Democrat- and maybe even some Republican-hated tax that the state can, with its new revenue estimate, probably afford.

See the squeeze here? It’s Republicans finding a lever that puts an election-year veto-proof vest on big tax cuts. It might force Democrats to hold their noses and vote for de-coupling of state income tax deductions from the federal standard deduction, worth about $60 million to the more prosperous and likely Republican Kansas income tax filers.

The Consensus Revenue Estimate has handed Republicans a political baseball bat. Had the estimate shown no increase in revenues, or just a small increase, the upcoming legislative session would be dull.

It’s starting to sound like a prom date now, isn’t it…?

— Syndicated by Hawver News Company LLC of Topeka; Martin Hawver is publisher of Hawver’s Capitol Report—to learn more about this nonpartisan statewide political news service, visit the website at www.hawvernews.com

(3) comments

SnowGypsy

This should turn out to be pretty interesting as it unfolds. Hopefully, this will seal the deal on Kelly not being re-elected. Kansas cannot afford to keep Kelly in office with her socialist agenda approved by none other than Bernie Sanders! So, this extra revenue must be due to the improvement of the economy due to putting a Democrat out of the White House.

SeanRanklin

Yeah socialist agendas are terrible with farming subsides, police, and fire departments. All forms socialism suck. This is sarcasm out of touch boomers on internet will overlook that.

Aim_High

I agree. Your governor wanting stable finances is bad for Kansas. Surplus cash is shameful. Kansas would be better off with Republicans creating huge budget deficits. This is also sarcasm, in case that went over your boomer head. You sound silly wanting to vote out a governor who has a half billion dollar surplus after 8 years of Brownback shortfalls. Blue and Red don't matter when the numbers are this black and white.

Brownback going to hang out with Dopie Donnie in DC is probably the best thing that's happened to Kansas in a long time! It is also pretty sad Republicans don't have a viable candidate and are having to resort to a criminal as their candidate. Also nice to see you're back to hating Bernie, you must be getting worried about the traction him and that socialist Warren have been getting. I'd be worried too.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.