ACLU attacks restrictions on protests in Kansas Statehouse

FILE - This March 27, 2019, file photo shows a giant banner in favor of Medicaid expansion hanging in the rotunda of the Kansas Statehouse in Topeka, Kan. The banner refers to House Majority Leader Dan Hawkins, R-Wichita, and the protest prompted a federal lawsuit over how the protesters were initially threatened with being banned from the building for a year.

TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — The American Civil Liberties Union asked a federal judge Wednesday to make it easier to protest inside the Kansas Statehouse, as some members of the Republican-controlled Legislature worry that liberal demonstrators have become increasingly disruptive.

An ACLU lawsuit challenges rules that require groups to obtain a legislative sponsor and an event permit for Statehouse demonstrations, and that prohibit hand-held signs and banners. The lawsuit also challenges the Capitol Police's authority to ban people from the building for violating the rules.

The ACLU filed its lawsuit after a March 27 protest in which protesters seeking an expansion of Medicaid eligibility hung huge banners inside the Statehouse rotunda. Capitol Police briefly detained three Kansas State University students who hung banners and told them they were banned from the building for a year. The ban was lifted the next day.

The state agreed to back off its enforcement of the rules in May, before the Legislature adjourned for the year, but the ACLU wants U.S. District Judge Holly Teeter to block their enforcement while its lawsuit goes forward. One of the students, Jonathan Cole, testified that he found his encounter with police "terrifying" and is wary of protesting inside the building because of the restrictions.

"I would need my government's permission, in essence, to protest at the Statehouse," Cole testified.

The Kansas attorney general's office is seeking to have the lawsuit dismissed, arguing that the rules are not as restrictive as the ACLU portrays them. Assistant Attorney General Arthur Chalmers even argued during the hearing that the rules apply to organized events, disagreeing with the ACLU that they also apply to demonstrations involving only a few people.

"This case is a series of straw men," Chalmers argued.

But Cole and Davis Hammet, a voting-rights advocate and veteran of numerous rallies for liberal causes, testified that they've been told demonstrators must have a permit. And Tom Day, the Legislature's director of administrative services, said hand-held signs would be confiscated under the rules.

Day defended the restrictions, saying they allowed officials to know what groups are in the building and what they plan, in part for safety reasons.

"We need to make sure everyone in the building is safe, including 4-year-old Johnny who is there for a tour," Day testified.

The court hearing came three weeks after a May 29 demonstration in the Senate gallery in favor of Medicaid expansion shut down the chamber temporarily. It was a protest against top Senate Republicans, who blocked a vote this year after the House approved an expansion plan backed by Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.

"It escalated with the banners," Senate Majority Leader Jim Denning, a Kansas City-area Republican, said last week. "They're agitators and they want you to engage either verbally or physically."

There have been no physical confrontations between protesters and lawmakers.

The March 27 protest for Medicaid expansion was followed by a May 3 demonstration in which about 15 protesters dropped thousands of leaflets depicting blood-stained, overdue hospital bills.

In the May 29 protest, a Unitarian minister stood in the gallery, chanting and signing and drowning out an unrelated Senate debate. Aides to Senate President Susan Wagle, a Wichita Republican, attempted to clear the floor, and a Capitol police officer even directed reporters who were recording the protest to leave — prompting letters of protest.

Even some Medicaid expansion supporters have expressed misgivings about the some of the protest tactics they're seeing.

"Sitting in the gallery, holding signs, or chanting in the rotunda, that's fine," said House Minority Leader Tom Sawyer, a Wichita Democrat and expansion supporter. "When they're chanting to the point where a session can't take place, I think that does cross a line."

The ACLU contends that the power granted to the state to deny permits or ban people from the building is too unfettered, and that enforcement could depend on the demonstrators' cause. The state rejects that idea, but the ACLU noted in court that some enforcement policies are unwritten.

"I'm sure we wouldn't have been here if they (the banners) had said, 'I love Susan Wagle,'" testified Rep. Jim Ward, a Wichita Democrat.

———

Follow John Hanna on Twitter: https://twitter.com/apjdhanna

Copyright 2019 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(6) comments

houndi

ACLU is a joke.They stick there nose where it don't belong.

SnowGypsy

If they are going to act like badly behaved children and disrupt Congress, than they should be banned. The ACLU went off the deep end a long time ago. One doesn't end up making a positive contribution when they are acting like horses' behinds! There are rules for a purpose, and I agree that for the safety of all, security needs to know who is there. As we know, the liberals have become not only disrespectful of laws and other legal processes, but violent, although as we know, they often hire people do be disruptive and violent against others rather than doing their own dirty work!

DrPepper

ACLU is at the top of my top donations list and has been for years. They tirelessly fight for equality for all.

DrPepper

Did you forget? Protest/dissent is the highest form of patriotism. Familiarize yourself with the ACLU’s goals. Think maybe you forgot or didn’t ever know their mission. Thanks.

DrPepper

I see you haven’t kept up and really should. You’ll find out very recently the lawsuit the ACLU and Council of Parents, Attorneys and Advocates, a national disabilities rights group, filed against the trump administration who violated federal law when it delayed Dept of Education rule designed to protect students with disabilities. It’s important for you as a parent to know these things. Google ACLU and disabled rights for the facts. Opinions are many but there’s always the facts easy to be found. You’re welcome.

SnowGypsy

Not equality for all, as a mother of an adult son with developmental disabilities, I can assure of that. They have "pet" groups they cater to just like all the other "feel good" organizations. They want to give rights to others at the same time depriving non-pet groups of there rights. They want to force others to believe and accept what they do. They advocate for the rights of criminals over the rights of victims. They are the guardians of the far left, and that just isn't "right" in my book. They are horrible and work to erode American values and laws. They put themselves above everyone like they are a "god" deciding right from wrong with everyone being required to follow them. Just "no"!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.