The Southern Lyon County board of education decided again to further study options in front of them to balance the 2010-11 budget for the district.
More than 200 people attended a board meeting that lasted more than three hours Wednesday. A large part of Wednesday evening’s discussion centered around balancing the 2010-11 budget. At the beginning of the meeting, three options were on the table. These included:
Option 1: which has a cost savings of $522,386 and calls for the reduction of the number of attendance centers from three to two and move to K-12 attendance centers to maintain both high schools and programs.
Option 2: Maintain three attendance centers with a savings of $360,000 and cutting nine positions in the district to get that savings.
Option 3: Combine both high schools into one and determine the location for a savings of between $594,475 to more than $685,000 depending on which suboption is chosen. The suboptions are:
F Option 3a: district junior/senior high school at Hartford, Olpe K-6 and Neosho Rapids K-6
F Option 3b: district junior/senior high school at Olpe, Olpe Elementary K-6, Hartford K-6 and Neosho Rapids closed.
F Option 3c: district junior/senior high school at Olpe, Olpe Elementary K-6, Neosho Rapids K-6 and Hartford closed.
F Option 3d: district junior high school; district high school; Olpe Elementary K-6 and Neosho Rapids Elementary K-6.
Around 10 p.m. and the conclusion of the discussion of the 2010-2011 budget, Superintendent Mike Argabright suggested a four-part option:
F Remove option 3 off the table.
“I do not feel our communities are ready for that component,” Argabright said. “Any of the scenarios with Option 3 will have an adverse effect on our enrollment. It takes away the integrity and tradition of our programs.”
F Implement and direct administrators to prepare and work on Option No. 2 as step one.
F Prepare Option 1 (Two K-12 structures) for a review of details at the March board meeting as step two.
F Timeline for implementation of Option No. 1:
“Criteria for full implementation for the 2010-11 school year:
Option No. 2 cannot fulfill the deficit. Determination of these criteria must be made on or before April 23, 2010.
If adequate cuts are made to fulfill the current deficit, Option No. 1 will be delayed and future reviewed for the 2011-12 school year.
The fall semester of the 2010-11 school term will be utilized to fully study, plan and prepare for transition of two k-12 school structures.”
The board came to a consensus to consider Argabright’s options and step away from the table for a period of time to consider the options at hand.
Comments
We allow registered users to post comments on this Web site. To learn more about our posting policies please read our User Poster Agreement Policy.
Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.