February 13, 2012

Emporia Weather

Currently Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
26° Snow
Partly Sunny
Rain Likely
Partly Sunny
Mostly Sunny
Light Snow Fog/Mist 34°
25°
46°
32°
46°
31°
47°
28°
49°
30°

Advertisement

Advertisement

Reader Poll

What should the City of Emporia do to improve Housing in Emporia

View all polls

Events

Search events

The Flint Hills Forest

Friday, September 18, 2009

In my last column, the news about the tallgrass prairie’s No. 1 enemy, the noxious week sericea lespedeza, appeared quite grim. And it is.

But I won’t leave the issue at that because those who are committed to preserving the tallgrass prairie have not come close to giving up the fight.

A quick recap of the problem: sericea’s [suh-REE-see-uh’s] aggressive, dominating spread across the prairie threatens to wipe out the native grasses, which would in turn destroy the cattle ranching industry.

In a very short time the prairie would “forest up,” as biologists say. It only takes about 50 years for an unmanaged prairie to be taken over by trees. If cattle ranching ended in the Flint Hills, the tallgrass prairie would be completely transformed into a woodland right about the time the Emporia High School class of 2009 was settling into retirement.

Welcome to the Flint Hills Forest, they’d tell their visiting grandkids.

Thankfully, researchers at our state universities are working on methods to curb sericea’s horrendous spread. As the experts noted in my last article, they’re winning some of the battles but, so far, losing the war.

With luck, some of the current research will turn that around.

A new study, launched just three months ago at K-State, is experimenting with an additive to cattle feed. Sericea’s high tannin content disagrees with the animals’ biology and they almost always avoid eating it. A previous additive experiment involving the chemical polyethylene glycol (PEG) did not produce workable results because the dosage needed to do the job was too high for FDA guidelines.

But the new study launched in June is working with natural substances that do the same thing as PEG.

K.C. Olson, an associate professor in Kansas State University’s Animal Sciences & Industry Department, explained the biochemistry to me. The high tannin content of mature sericea plants binds with proteins inside the cattle and makes the protein of that plant—and the other digesting plants—unavailable to its system. A substance like PEG binds to the tannin so that it can’t do that kind of damage to the protein.

Unlike PEG, the natural compounds that Dr. Olson is studying are inexpensive, abundant and safe. His study will determine whether or not adding them to feed will induce the cattle to literally chomp out the sericea crisis.

“If we can make cattle not have a negative experience with that plant, and they’ll eat it throughout the grazing season, two things may happen,” Dr. Olson said from his office at K-State. “First, we may be able to take pressure off our native plants that might cause them harm, and second, put enough pressure on this undesirable plant to keep it from spreading and from producing so much seed.”

The experiment is still in the test-tube laboratory stage and will eventually progress out to the pastures, where it will become a long-term operation. “It’s the animal testing that can take such a long time,” said Olson. “We’ll be working on it for several years.”

And we’ll be crossing our fingers.

Patch burning is another experimental method that shows potential. Burning is a spring ritual on the tallgrass prairie, as it allows the growth of more new grass for cattle, puts more nutrients into the soil and curbs the growth of brush and trees. With patch burning, just a section of a rancher’s grazing land is burned, which attracts the cattle to that specific area. Concentrated, hard grazing on that patch appears to take a toll on sericea seedlings.

“There are some studies done by Oklahoma State on this patch burn technique,” said Walter Fick, associate professor of range science at K-State and the region’s top sericea expert. He knows of an experiment done with yearling steers, “not an animal we think of eating sericea a lot,” he said, yet “they did seem to utilize a high percentage of the plants to the point that they might have reduced seed production.”

William Browning is experimenting with patch burning on his ranch near Madison, and other ranches are interested in the outcomes. It’s not an easy method; fire is unpredictable and burning a relatively small piece of pasture is tricky. It is much easier to go the traditional way and burn off an entire acreage, but ranchers like Browning consider it worth the effort.

Currently, pesticides are the main line of attack against sericea. Fick has specific recommendations for spraying, which he outlines in “Sericea Lespedeza Control Time Is Now,” an article available on the K-State Research and Extention website (www.ksre.ksu.edu).

Olson is convinced that science will find a solution to the sericea threat, and his attitude strikes a welcome chord of hope. “I have been alarmed in my career before,” he said. “There have been problems like sericea lespedeza before, but I bet on technology every time. We are going to beat this thing.”

Comments

dml (anonymous) says...

This is my 3rd year of swathing and baling Sericia for hay for my cowherd. There are 2 things that made me start doing it. First, my dad was telling a guy who worked on the same ranch dad did back in the early '60's about this noxious weed taking over the country. The guy asked dad what it was and dad told him Sericia. The guy asked dad what he thought he was feeding to the cattle in the showbarn back when they worked for the same ranch. Dad said, "Alfalfa", but the guy said, "No it wasn't, it was Sericia. We had 60 acres under irrigation that we put up for hay every 28 days. The 2nd thing that happened is that Jeff Davidson, Greenwood county agent, had a program at the Anderson building talking about prairie invaders and the main topic was Sericia. The fall before, he had a field day at someone's pasture and about 2 weeks before the field day, the sericia had been sprayed and on the day of the field day, the cattle were eating it. At that meeting, Jeff hypothesized that the Tannin leaves the Sericia after it dies. The first year that I baled it, the Sericia was 5' tall in places when I cut it for hay in September when it was blooming before going to seed. Last year, it was about 3-4' tall, and this year, it was only 1 1/2 to 2' tall and had a lot less canopy. Last year, I mowed it off at about 2" whereas the year before I left about 6" to leave as much brome and fescue to graze as possible. This year, I mowed it at 6" again to see if that affected the plant vigor. The pasture had been broke then sewed to brome and fescue back in the middle '60's and now, it has a lot of Little Bluestem and Indiangrass (both native prairie grasses) moving in and getting established. I have not used any chemical to try to control the sericia. The only chemical this pasture has seen is the Remedy/Diesel mix that Gary Kilgore recommends using on hedge stumps to keep them from growing back after cutting the trees down. One practice I am planning on trying to implement next year is burning where I have trees and am unable to get into to cut hay and see if I can get the my cattle to graze that more heavily early in the season to see if that will hurt the sericia. The main thing I do not like about burning sericia, is that we had noticed some plants starting in another brome pasture one fall and we burned it the following spring (about 20 years ago) and that summer we had about 100 times more sericia in that pasture. Researchers have since discovered that burning "scarifies" the seed and causes it to germinate, The areas I am planning on burning in this pasture, however, I am not worried about that because I already have a solid stand of Sericia under the trees.

September 18, 2009 at 10:47 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

create (anonymous) says...

A very interesting article and equally interesting comment from dml. A good bit of scientific research of your own there, dml.

While traveling here and there, I notice how some pastures are so clean. Some however, are full of little to large cedar trees and the grass looks unhealthy. Is burning or not burning the reason? Why doesn't everybody burn?

Are neighbors at odds with each other when one burns and one lets his pasture go to weeds and cedar? It would seem that some of these pastures have no caretaker at all. I've also noticed that those pastures that have been sold off to homebuilding have begun to go to cedar.

Finally, Ms Felix. Has any research been done connecting human obesity with the hormones and chemicals administered to cattle?

September 19, 2009 at 6:14 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

felixauthor (anonymous) says...

I'm sorry, but I have not done any research on the link between human obesity and hormones fed to cattle. Thanks for your comments, though. --AF

October 4, 2009 at 12:59 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

oh4theluvof (anonymous) says...

"In a very short time the prairie would “forest up,” as biologists say. It only takes about 50 years for an unmanaged prairie to be taken over by trees. If cattle ranching ended in the Flint Hills, the tallgrass prairie would be completely transformed into a woodland right about the time the Emporia High School class of 2009 was settling into retirement."

I do not understand this. If this is the case, how was it prairie land before it was settled? Admittedly, most of my knowledge of the subject comes from the Little House On The Prairie series, but it is still a first-hand account of the differences between the vegetations and coverages as the family travelled. It was unmanaged prairie with few trees at that time and it always had been. I am also not understanding what the noxious weed, Sericia, has to do with the tree population. What am I missing here?

October 4, 2009 at 9:50 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Advertisements