February 14, 2012

Emporia Weather

Currently Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
21° Partly Sunny
Rain Likely
Partly Sunny
Mostly Sunny
Mostly Sunny
Fog/Mist 44°
33°
49°
31°
45°
27°
49°
29°
48°
29°

Advertisement

Advertisement

Reader Poll

What should the City of Emporia do to improve Housing in Emporia

View all polls

Events

Search events

Scientific safety

Saturday, December 27, 2008

Talk about a happy holiday and a great New Year.

     Kansas recently received news the Department of Homeland Security is recommending the National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility (NBAF) be built on the Kansas State University campus in Manhattan. This decision will mean a $451 million federal scientific laboratory will accelerate animal disease research to protect our U.S. food supply and agricultural economy.

 In Kansas and our neighboring states, protecting our food supply — crops and animals — is essential. This nation’s economy depends on farmers and ranchers and those who work in this valuable sector.

 Agriculture provides more the 22 million jobs in the United States even though less than 2 million are farmers and ranchers. The agribusiness sector contributes more than $1 trillion annually to this nation’s economy. This amounts to 15 percent of the U.S. Gross Domestic Product.

 "Farmers and cattlemen have long been asking for an acceleration of U.S. research to combat dangerous animal diseases, so we are pleased that the federal government has put that mission first in recommending Kansas as home for the National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility,” said KFB president and Ottawa County grain farmer Steve Baccus.

 Kansas is ready to facilitate the proposed National Bio and Agro-Defense facility. The charge of this facility will be to provide our nation with a safe, secure and innovative laboratory to develop research and response capabilities designed to protect our people and our nation’s agriculture from naturally occurring and intentionally introduced disease threats.

  Kansas is the wise choice because it can accelerate the NBAF’s research to protect the American food supply and agriculture economy. There will be no learning curve in Kansas for this work. Our state can contribute immediately with our internationally recognized animal health research expertise, strong research infrastructure and unmatched concentration of animal health companies.

 More importantly, Kansas also has a unique understanding of the importance of the NBAF research mission because of its deep agriculture heritage.

 Once built, NBAF will serve as the nation’s premier research facility for developing vaccines and countermeasures for diseases that threaten livestock and other animals. Experts consider the facility an urgent national priority due to agriculture’s vulnerability to naturally occurring diseases or agro-terrorism.

 These facilities are safe both for the general public and laboratory researchers, according to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease. To date there are no recorded incidents involving community contamination from any of the existing facilities in the United States.

 NBAF has the potential to position Kansas as a leader in the medical, food and agricultural research, science and technology fields, say those close to the effort to bring the facility to the Sunflower State. The project could create more than 300 jobs and generate an estimated economic return of $3.5 billion during the next 20 years.

 The Kansas Congressional delegation applauded the announcement with U.S. Sen. Pat Roberts saying, “On the merits, Kansas is the best place to conduct this much needed research to keep America’s dinner table safe. We’ve been doing this for decades, giving us a tremendous running start, and now we’re ready to get to work with the Departments of Homeland Security and Agriculture to fulfill the NBAF mission.”

  Having the NBAF located in the agricultural heartland will be ideal for the region and certainly advantageous for the nation.

  With deep roots in agriculture, long-standing expertise in medicine and veterinary sciences, abundant technological resources, dedicated citizens and location in the center of our nation, Kansas is exceptionally well suited to be the new home for the National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility.

  F John Schlageck is a leading commentator on agriculture and rural Kansas. Born and raised on a diversified farm in northwestern Kansas, his writing reflects a lifetime of experience, knowledge and passion.

Comments

madpoet (anonymous) says...

I certainly hope my worst fears don't come true with this facility. It was orginally on an island far from any livestock or crops for a reason. There were a couple of incidents at the old facility where there were leaks but since there was no nearby vectors, it was stopped before it spread. You get a problem here, we could be facing the need to destroy all nearby livestock. Years ago, they ran a scenerio on what would happen and decided it would be a disaster and the lab shouldn't be here. Roberts was against it then. Funny how he changed his mind when all he can see is re-election and dollar signs. This could cost us way more than it brings in if there's any accident. I don't like the thought of hoof-and-mouth disease (among others) being studied so close to livestock. I'll be praying that nothing horrible happens.

December 27, 2008 at 2:04 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

alfalfa (anonymous) says...

In the event there is some type of accident, it will be interesting to see if any of the people who have pushed this lab(and labeled anyone against it either out of touch or a fearmonger) will step up and take responsibility for their lack of objectivity in bringing the lab to Kansas. Seems to me you would want this lab as far away from the heart of livestock country as you could get it, yet here we are nearly begging the Feds to put it right where an accident can cause the most harm. All I hear about is the 500 jobs this is supposed to create, I never hear about the price if there is an accidental release of one of the organisms they will be working with.

It is also interesting that in this time of economic hardship for our nation, that building a new lab seems a better option than remodeling the old one, I am under the impression about $150 million could be saved by remodeling Plum island.

Sure seems like those of us with a little fear about this are in the minority, or do we just not get any press?

December 27, 2008 at 2:37 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Advertisements