The H. Dale Buck Animal Welfare Fund is in desperate need of adoptive and foster families for area dogs.
Two animals are being housed at the Emporia Veterinary Hospital. Ellie May, a young cairn terrier mix, and McDoogal, an adult cavalier King Charles spaniel mix, are being housed at Emporia Veterinary Hospital and need homes now. Buck Fund Director MiChielle Cooper said dogs can only be housed at the animal hospital for a limited time and should be adopted first.
Cooper said on Wednesday that the situation is critical, especially with foster homes. The organization only has three full-time foster homes for dogs and one full-time foster home for cats.
“These are the people that we go to time and time again, over and over and they literally foster dogs for us year-round with no breaks,” Cooper said. “We have some other people that foster for us but it’s on a much more limited scale.”
Cooper said the foster homes are full with a couple of them having five foster dogs each.
“I personally am going to have seven by the end of this week,” she said.
It’s difficult to tell people no when they have an adoptable animal, Cooper said, adding that often there is no other alternative if an animal is turned away but for them to be put down.
“We generally try to make it work,” she said.
The Buck Fund is trying to find ways to bring in more indoor dog foster homes.
“We have plenty of outdoor dog fosters,” she said.
There is a demand for dogs who are house trained and have had some obedience training, Cooper said. Indoor foster homes put dogs through obedience training and potty train them, making the dogs more adoptable.
There are requirements that all foster homes must meet, Cooper said. Interested foster families have to fill out a form with the Kansas Department of Animal Health, a Buck Fund application and a volunteer application. Representatives with the Buck Fund make sure the home is a safe environment that has a fenced-in yard. All existing pets must be spayed or neutered and current on vaccinations. After that is done, a form is sent to the state and the state sends back a foster license and the home is ready to accept animals, Cooper said.
If Interested in adopting one of the dogs at the Emporia Animal Hospital, call 342-6515. If interested in volunteering for the Buck Fund or becoming a foster home, contact the Buck Fund at 343-3377.
To see the pets available at the fund, go to www.buckfund.petfinder.com.
madpoet (anonymous) says...
The cost of adopting animals from the Buck Fund or shelter probably deters many people. When I checked the adoption fee for the shelter, that and the poor hours, really put me off. Once you figure in the cost of shots etc and add $40 or so to that...Most people don't have that kind of extra money in today's economy. Maybe if a way were found to reduce the adoption costs, more pets could find homes.
September 12, 2007 at 3:55 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Flips (anonymous) says...
AMEN!!!
When we adopted a cat it was $65.00------that was a lot of money for a cat we had to doctor & pay vet bills & have it's shots given to it------we very soon had about a $500.00 cat!!
We moved to the country & we let it outside once in awhile & one afternoon it didn't come back from roaming in the orchard & the coyotes ate it!
We were sick about it-- as the darn cat was a family member by then- & it was also had very expensive coyote food!!!!!!!!!
September 12, 2007 at 4:44 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
create (anonymous) says...
madpoet, I agree, I was put off too, but not as much by the cost of shots, etc. In my case, the person who interviewed me seemed quite rude and said I couldn't adopt a dog because I didn't have a doggy door at my house. Without a doggy door, I would have to be at home to let the dog out several times a day. When I said that I worked full time, that was enough. She said I couldn't have a dog. Just like that. I would have been willing to install a doggie door, but not after that. I could have gone to the shelter I suppose.
September 12, 2007 at 5:09 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Firecracker (anonymous) says...
I adopted a dog from the Buck Fund, and before I committed to the adoption I called around to the area vet clinics to price out those services included in their adoption fee to see what it really cost. It would have cost me $275. My adoption fee was only $150. They also provided me with a complete vet record on my pet AND she was already housebroke!!
Check their website out! www.buckfund.petfinder.com it states (copied from site)>>"Adopting a friend<<
Our adoption paperwork process takes a minimum of one hour. Prospective pet parents are asked to complete a preliminary adoption profile, visit with an adoption counselor, and spend time with the pet before finalizing any paperwork. All applications are processed in the order received, but an adoption is made to the best application received for each of our animals. All applicants must provide a vet reference on the adoption application. If you are adopting a dog from the Buck Fund, a fenced in yard for the dog will be required. Home visits often occur on each adoption. The Buck Fund has the right to deny adoption to any applicant for any reason without explanation. All pets will be spayed or neutered prior to coming home with their new families. The reference checking process, and spay or neuter surgery for your pet will create a 24-72 hour hold period prior to the completion of the adoption. You will be asked to sign an adoption contract, and pay an adoption fee. The adoption fee includes a spay/neuter surgery, complete physical exam, wormer, bordatella vaccination, nail trim, heartworm test, fecal evaluation, DA2PP vaccination, Feline Leukemia/Feline AIDS test, FVRCP vaccination, ear mite treatment, Heartgard and Frontline preventatives, and any emergency veterinary care needed upon intake. The average retail costs for these services is nearly $300 in our area. Our adoption fees range from $50 to $250 based on the health, age and condition of the pet. This adoption fee helps cover vet expenses incurred by the Buck Fund. Please remember that the adoption fee is not for purchase of a dog or cat, but rather to cover the medical cost of all companion animals in our care. We appreciate you choosing the H.Dale Buck Animal Welfare Fund to find a pet. We spend great deal of money, time and effort to assure that you have the healthiest, and most well-mannered pets to choose from."
I had a very good experience adopting my dog from them :-)
September 12, 2007 at 5:30 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Wallace (anonymous) says...
I had a wonderful experience adopting my cats from the Buck Fund! I was happy to pay any fees that they had because I knew that they would be free from all sickness, disease and illness. That meant a lot to me because I did not want to bring home sick pets and run the risk of infecting my other pets. I am grateful that they try to save so many animals and it made me feel good to help out their organization. One of the cats that I adopted is trying to help me type this email so he must feel the same way! Thanks Buck Fund!
September 13, 2007 at 8:44 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ACO (anonymous) says...
THE BUCK FOUNDATION IS A WONDERFUL RESCUE GROUP THATS SAVES MANY, MANY OF YOUR UNWANTED PETS. THEIR ADOPTION FEE IS TO HELP COVER THE VETERINARY COSTS OF MAKING THAT UNWANTED FELINE OR CANINE HEALTHY AND VACCINATED AND SPAY OR NEUTERED (WHICH IS THE SOLUTION FOR THIS OVER POPULATED DISPOSIBLE PET WORLD YOU LIVE IN). WE IN THE ANIMAL FIELD GET SO MANY CALLS EVERYDAY TO TAKE YOUR UNWANTED PET. I HAVE ALLERGYS, I'M MOVING, I HAVE NO TIME FOR A PET, IT WAS MY CHILDS PET AND HE/SHE WON'T TAKE CARE OF IT AND NUMEROUS OTHER EXCUSES TO NOT BE RESPONCIBLE AND DISPOSE OF YOUR PET. WE WANT THESE FUR-BABIES TO GO TO THE BEST POSSIBLE HOME, THAT IS FOREVER. PETS ARE NOT DISPOSIBLE AND THEY REQUIRE A LIFE LONG COMMITMENT. MY THANKS TO THE BUCK FOUNDATION AND ALL THE RESCUE GROUPS WHO CARE AND HELP. THANKS TO ALL OF YOU I HAVE NOT HAD TO EUTHANIZED ONE ANIMAL THIS YEAR!!! HANG IN THERE ONE DAY WE WILL GET THESE PEOPLE EDUCATED.
September 13, 2007 at 2:02 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
47hclwym (anonymous) says...
WE CAN HEAR YOU, YOU DON'T HAVE YELL.
September 13, 2007 at 2:23 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ACO (anonymous) says...
WELL FIRST OFF I'M NOT YELLING MY CAP LOCK IS STUCK. SECOND, LOL???? TAKE ONE DAY IN AN ANIMAL CONTOL OFFICER OR A RESCUE GROUP PERSON SHOES AND THEN TELL ME THAT YOU WANT TO HAVE OR ADOPT OUT A PET THAT IS NOT SPAY OR NEUTERED. LEAVE THE BREEDING TO LICENSED QUALIFIED BREEDERS. THIS OVER POPULATION OF UNWANTED PETS IS NO LAUGHING MATTER. SPEND ONE DAY IN A SHELTER ON THE DAY THEY HAVE TO EUTHANIZE. YOU WON'T BE LAUGHING OUT LOUD.
September 13, 2007 at 3:54 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ACO (anonymous) says...
IT'S NOT OUR FAULT
AS ANIMAL SHELTER PERSONEL, WITH VARIOUS DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES, WE MAKE THE FOLLOWING PROMISES AND DECLARATIONS:
WE HEREBY PROMISE TO LOVE AND CARE FOR THE PETS BROUGHT INTO THIS SHELTER TO THE BEST OF OUR ABILITY.
WE PROMISE TO MAKE THEM AS COMFORTABLE AS POSSIBLE IN AN IMPOSSIBLE SITUATION.
WHEN ALL ELES FAILS, WE PROMISE TO END THEIR LIVES HUMANELY IN ORDER TO MAKE ROOM FOR THE ENDLESS SUPPLY OF ANIMALS TO FOLLOW.
HOWEVER, WE ALSO STAND FIRM WITH THE FOLLOWING:
WE DID NOT CAUSE THESE ANIMALS TO BE BORN INTO THIS OVERPOPULATED WORLD.
WE DID NOT CAUSE THESE PETS TO BECOME A PROBLEM OR INCONVENIENT TO THEIR OWNERS.
WE DID NOT CAUSE THEIR OWNERS TO MOVE, TO HAVE KIDS, TO BECOME ALLERGIC TO THEM, OR TO BECOME ILL. WE WILL NOT ACCEPT, NOR ALLOW THE BLAME TO BE PLACED ON US, THE GUILT THAT BELONGS TO THE OWNERS OF THESE PETS.
IT IS NOT OUR FAULT
September 13, 2007 at 4:10 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ACO (anonymous) says...
OKAY I WILL EXPLAIN THAT TO YOU. YOU HAVE AN UNALTERED DOG OR CAT, IF MALE IT COULD PREGNATE A FEMALE, IF FEMALE A MALE COULD PREGNATE HER. I HEAR PEOPLE SAY MY DOG/ CAT NEVER GETS OUT, BUT IT HAPPENS AND DOGS/CATS CAN GET IN. WHAT WE ARE HOPING FOR IS TO EDUCATE PEOPLE SO THAT THERE ARE FEWER UNWANTED PUPPIES, KITTENS, DOGS AND CATS. AS MY POST SAID WHY WOULD YOU WANT AN UNALTERED PET? ARE YOU A BREEDER? MY POINT IS THAT THIS IS NO LAUGHING MATTER. OVER POPULATION OF ANIMALS IS VERY SERIOUS AND WE SHOULD ALL DO OUR PART TO TRY AND HELP. WHETHER IT BE STERILIZING OUR PETS OR TRYING TO EDUCATE THE PUBLIC OR BEING A FOSTER PARENT TO AN UNWANTED ANIMAL LOOKING FOR A FOREVER HOME.THIS IS ALL RESCUE GROUPS AND SHELTERS POLICY, NOT JUST THE BUCK FOUNDATIONS.
September 13, 2007 at 5:27 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
JFThill (anonymous) says...
I would like to say that I think the Buck Fund is fantastic. They have saved so many dogs & cats. I live in a small town & my daughter is the ACO here. Between her & the Buck Fund they have saved many. Before she was ACO there were so many running the streets, getting into trash, scaring the elderly & children. She has also scooped several off the street. What a shame. I am a part time foster mom for the Buck Fund. It is truely a great feeling to see them go to a furever home. My husband & I are retired & we have 4 dogs & they are our babies. They are house dogs & we have a fenced in back yard. We adopted 2 from shelters & 1 from the Buck Fund & bought 1 from a breeder. She is a pure bred but as soon as she was old enough we had her spayed. I feel unless you are a breeder this is the appropriate thing to do. I fostered a pregnant dog & she had difficulties when she gave birth. Two of them died 24 hrs later. Two lived. I also seen a 12 year old dog give birth to puppies. Bless her heart, she was entirely too old for that. So lets love our babies & do the right thing. Thanks again Buck Fund for all you do & thank you for my baby. JFThill
September 13, 2007 at 6:18 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ACO (anonymous) says...
THANKS MOM,THE BUCK FOUNDATION AND I DID RESCUE A 12 YEAR OLD LAST YEAR THAT HAD 9 PUPS, SO ELDERLY ANIMALS CAN BREED. SHE IS SPAY NOW AND HAPPY IN A FUREVER HOME. Kstrebuchet- WHAT HAPPENED TO THE ANIMALS YOU ADOPTED FROME EMPORIA AND TOPEKA SHELTERS? DOGS CAN GET IN OR OUT OF A PEN IF THERE IS A FEMALE IN HEAT. I WOULD SUGGEST THAT THEY HAVE STRICKTER ADOPTION POLICIES. WE NEED TO BE A PART OF THE SOLUTION - NOT THE PROBLEM. ALL BUT ONE OF MY DOGS ARE RESCUE DOGS(SPAY & NEUTERED )AND SHE IS A P.B. YORKIE FROM A WONDERFUL BREEDER AND I HAD HER SPAY.
September 13, 2007 at 6:37 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
create (anonymous) says...
Aha!! How did you type Kstrebuchet in lower case, ACO?
Create winks at Kstrebuchet -- need a pamphlet or two on the birds and the bees? LOL
September 13, 2007 at 7:54 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ACO (anonymous) says...
AHHH EVER HEARD OF COPY AND PASTE???? NO THANK YOU I'VE SEEN ENOUGH UNWANTED PUPPIES AND KITTENS AND I AM PART OF THE SOLUTION, BUT I HAVE SEVERAL INFORMATION FLYERS IF YOU'D LIKE ONE OR TWO TO EDUCATE YOURSELF ON HOW TO PREVENT THE PET OVERPOPULATION. THIS REALLY IS NO LAUGHING MATTER IT IS LIFE OR DEATH FOR THESE UNWANTED PETS.
September 13, 2007 at 8:19 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ACO (anonymous) says...
There are folks who don't understand
what rescue is about, or why it works the way it does, and that's okay as
long as they're willing to be educated. The ones who want to condemn rescue
people and animal control people without ever understanding the issues, and
who don't WANT to understand the issues, will always be out there and vocal.
Just remember: there's a cure for ignorance, and it's called education, but
there's no cure for stupid. THAT IS ALSO A COPY AND PASTE FROM A VERY SMART MAN, WHO IS ALSO IN THE ANIMAL RESCUE FIELD. I'M NOT JUDGING YOU, I AM SAYING PUT YOURSELF IN THIS POSITION AND THEN YOU WOULD UNDERSTAND WHY THE POLICIES ARE PUT IN PLACE. I AM SORRY FOR THE LOSS OF YOUR 2 DOGS AND I HAVE SEEN WONDERFUL OUTDOOR PENS AND I HAVE SEEN A MALE DOG CHEW THROUGH CHAIN LINK FENCE TO GET TO A FEMALE IN HEAT. I HOPE IT NEVER HAPPENS TO YOU. PLEASE DON'T CONDEM THE VERY PEOPLE WHO ARE SAVING THESE ANIMALS BECAUSE YOU DON'T AGREE WITH THEIR ADOPTION POLICIES.
--
September 13, 2007 at 8:48 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
lookup (anonymous) says...
kstreebucket how long have you had the dog? why was it not ever spayed to begin with? companion animals usually like to live with their companion, not in a pen with hard concrete floors. hard on the joints. does it sleep in the house?
September 13, 2007 at 9:58 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Denise_Dorcey (anonymous) says...
ACO, don't waste your time on create and Kstrebuchet. They have nothing better to do than bait people on the Gazette blog.
The Buck Fund is wonderful and a great asset to this community!
September 13, 2007 at 10:13 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ACO (anonymous) says...
THANK YOU LOOKUP AND DENISE, I KNOW I JUST WANT TO EDUCATE PEOPLE AND TRY TO HELP CREATE A SOLUTION FOR THIS OVER POPULATED, UNWANTED PET WORLD. THE BUCK FOUNDATION IS WONDERFUL AND MY HERO FOR ALL THE LIVES THEY HAVE HELPED ME AND OTHERS SAVE. I KNOW YOUR PETS ARE FAMILY MEMBERS :-)
September 13, 2007 at 11:04 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
MrCmonkeeDo (anonymous) says...
So the SOLUTION FOR THIS OVER POPULATED, UNWANTED PET WORLD is to deny pet ownership to a person who clearly wants one?
SeeYa...wouldn' wanna be Ya.
September 13, 2007 at 11:36 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ACO (anonymous) says...
WANTIING A PET... BEING ABLE TO PROVIDE A PROPER HOME, PROPER VET CARE, COMPANIONSHIP AND A LIFE LONG COMMITMENT, THATS WHAT WE WANT AND THOSE QUALITIES WILL INSURE THAT THE PET HAS A FUREVER HOME. YEAH WITH ALL THE UNWANTED PETS I HAVE TO TAKE IN... I WOULDN'T WANT TO BE ME EITHER.
September 14, 2007 at 12:05 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
siamesefred (anonymous) says...
Good grief, folks. I don't see Kstrebuchet and Create baiting anyone on this thread. Ks... has a problem with a single Buck Fund rule, has stated that opinion and said that he'll continue to adopt from other groups NOT the buck fund. Nothing wrong with that.
September 14, 2007 at 6:48 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
petlover (anonymous) says...
Hey mrC. Every business & organization has rules & policies. Much research goes into making them for tried & true reasons. Just because someone "wants" a pet doesn't mean they can provide a good home. The shelters are full of cute pet shop puppies that grew into out ot control dogs because someone "wanted" the puppy THAT day. BYB (back yard breeders) think 2 dogs that look pure bred can make them a couple bucks because the neighbor "wants" one, sell one or two, & the rest end up in the shelters with genectic defects from parents that never should have been bred/poor quality.
kstrebuchet---- didn't see your answer, where does your dog sleep? You said your dog couldn't run off if it did get out, is it too crippled up from living on cement? Sounds like you used to breed it, you mentioned you're not "making anymore little puppies". Making a couple bucks on your "good huntin' dog" maybe?
Animal rescue is a bottomless pit thanks to all the low mentality people who don't understand, Hang in there Buck Fund! The good Lord knows all the work you do, you all are blessed.
September 14, 2007 at 7:16 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Weltha (anonymous) says...
pet- I don't think treb said "making any more little puppies" to imply he/she was in the past. I know this person and their spouse. They are some of the best people I have known when it comes to pets. They have taken in SOOOO many that people just dump on the side of the road. I'm surprised they aren't bankrupt from it. They walk their dogs every morning and every night after work. I don't see why 1 old cripled dog needs to be neutered to adopt another that has been. I to have been down that route. I tryed to adopt a 4 year old spayed sheltie. met EVERY requirement but my other dog wasn't. I have no plans of it. I am not breeding him. So I wnet to the 1 place you all hate the most. OOPs... I helped a puppy mill make more pets because I was not allowed to give my love and attention to 1 that was already here and needed it. Shame on me? YES. Did I get one of the sweetest dogs you will ever see out of it? YES. So maybe someone needs to get off the high horse and realize there are more good homes for htses pets then you think.
September 14, 2007 at 8:31 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
create (anonymous) says...
Amen on being done with this thread, trebuchet. Whew! I'm beginning to understand why the woman I spoke to at the Buck Fund was so rude to me. All I did was ask a question about why someone who worked full time couldn't have a dog. Geez, I was willing to install a doggie door. My backyard was indeed fenced. But it was too late. She had already diverted to attack mode. I'm outtahere.
September 14, 2007 at 8:46 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
JFThill (anonymous) says...
I have read all the comments & just want to add: "Stick with your policies Buck Fund". I agree with them. I commend you for all you've done. Also the ACO (even though she is my daughter) should be commended for all the hard work she does. Keep up the good work.
September 14, 2007 at 8:58 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
PJean (anonymous) says...
Most people have the best intentions for adopting an animal, however; responsible pet ownership should include the sterilization of that pet. Most people have "no plans" of having their animals bred, but when one comes in season they show great inititive in becoming bred. Houdini has nothing on some of the dogs I've seen that get out of fences and chained areas where they are kept when a female is in heat. I understand that the cost is prohibitive for some people, however; it is part of the care of the animal. I have adopted many animals over the years, I also have purchased from reputable breeders. Either way, criticizing an agency for their sterilization policies is nonproductive at best, ignorant at the very least. It is our responsibility to be good stewards of our available resources and of our pets well being. I see nothing wrong with the way the Buck Foundation combines those two responsibilities in their adoption process.
September 14, 2007 at 8:59 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
MrCmonkeeDo (anonymous) says...
So the SOLUTION FOR THIS OVER POPULATED, UNWANTED PET WORLD is to deny pet ownership to a person who clearly wants one AND "can provide a good home?"
SeeYa...wouldn' wanna be Ya.
September 14, 2007 at 9:11 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
MrCmonkeeDo (anonymous) says...
ALso, MrCmonkeeDo is PRo-aniMAL-LIfe. HISmonkeeGod (Davey) says IT's WRONG to spayNneuter OUR brethren. WhataYa thiNK about THEM apples?
September 14, 2007 at 9:31 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
petlover (anonymous) says...
If ya don't want to adopt from the Buck Fund, call the flint hills humane society! see how many animals they have. LOL !!They're nothing but a bank account!
Shelters are temporary place for the unwanted. 70%+ don't make it out alive. The concrete for a short time is unavoidable. Foster homes allow time for adoption without living in a small cage. It feels good to open your home & heart. It could save a life!
Hope all the dogs outside in dog houses stay warm this winter! Don't let 'em suffer.
September 14, 2007 at 10:09 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
KristieR (anonymous) says...
I don't think there's any doubt that there are irresponsible pet owners, but to say that it's a person's own fault they developed allergies.........um......kind of hard to predict if your child will develop allergies.
We recently adopted a cat from a co-worker whose child almost died of an allergic reaction because they didn't give the cat away sooner. I would wipe that reason off your list of things to whine about.
I do give kudos to anyone who spends so much time and effort to rescuing animals, but I do think that you (in general) go overboard in the requirements of what the adoptive family must be like prior to approving adoption. I think the costs are fine, because I know the money goes back to cover the expenses of the foundation itself. It's more like a charitable donation in my eyes.
K
September 14, 2007 at 10:21 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
KUtriSIS (anonymous) says...
KristieR: Your co-worker did a very good thing in trying to find a home for the animal before just dumping it off at the shelter. It's too bad that the child was allergic and NO that is not something that can be known until the allergies are developed and the animal is around the person long enough for the reaction to take place. But it is for this reason that it can be such a long drawn out process for willing people to adopt a new member of their family. Get that I said their FAMILY. That's what the shelters and the SPCA and different places are trying to stress to people. Having an animal is a life long commitment and just like deciding it's time to have a baby it cannot be just a spur of the moment decision. The allergy thing cannot be helped but anyone thinking about adopting an animal should talk to friends and relatives about it. It would be just like if you were to pass away and leave the animal alone, you would want to have someone that is willing to take care of them. Do this for any reason, make sure that if your circumstances change there is someone that is willing to step in as a responsible owner. And that doesn't mean that you are making arrangements for the dog to be passed over to them when they get older and they aren't a puppy anymore and your child doesn't want him anymore. If you are thinking in that way than you do NOT deserve to adopt. For anyone that doesn't feel an animal is a life long commitment and feels there will always be homes out there for the animals OR they think those puppies that are getting ready to be born next door are going to be the perfect addition to your backyard THINK AGAIN! Everytime you buy, a animal that you could have adopted instead of funding irresponsible breeders DIES, they are euthanized. People that think spaying and neutering is not important YOU ARE PART OF THE OVER POPULATION PROBLEM. And if you don't realize just how bad the over population problem is then get your @$$ in the BACK of an animal shelter for just one day and try to keep track of all the animals that are euthanized in that day because there were no homes that wanted them. And for anyone that thinks euthanasia is not a big deal YOUR WRONG. This is the most humane way but it is still horrible. It is not quiet like they are just going to sleep. Sometimes they have horrible seizures, devicate on themselves, scream horribly AND THEN there is nothing else to do with them but to stack them in freezers and barrels for the next step of the process.
September 14, 2007 at 11:37 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ACO (anonymous) says...
KUtriSIS You have that right euthanasia is horrible. All GODs creatures should have a chance to be apart of a family. I wasn't picking on anyone for having allergies, I just said it wasn't our fault as aco's or shelter personel that this happens. I'm not a whiner, I'm an action taker, I have 3 foster dogs at my home waiting on their furever home. We need more people in this world like you :-) My fosters are in the home being a part of our family and not in a small cage. I have never heard of an applicant being turned down for the color of his shirt.
September 14, 2007 at 12:09 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
KUtriSIS (anonymous) says...
If I was in any way able to afford fostering more animals I would jump on that in a heart beat. I have rescue dogs, one was dumped at a shelter as a puppy and is of a breed mix that doesn't usually get cleared for adoption and the other one was an abused dog that was dumped near my home. It's something I am proud of. I gave them life, the best gift anyone can give.
September 14, 2007 at 12:44 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ACO (anonymous) says...
KUtriSIS I want to say thank you and I'm proud of you too. Life is the BEST gift. They sure give allot of love back don't they.
September 14, 2007 at 1:04 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
MelissaE (anonymous) says...
I guess I'm on the fence. I think that most animal adoption facilities are too strict. For example, when I wanted another cat (because my other cat had been run over by a car), I was basically chastised because I was the horrible owner who allowed her cat to actually go outside in the first place.
Outdoors = natural habitat for all animals, duh.
And I've seen rules where the adoptor has to agree that the agency can come and "inspect" at any time to make sure the adoptor is abiding by whatever rules have been put in place. So, in other words, if I had gotten a cat and let him/her outside and the agency came over to "check" us, what would they do? Take it back? Add another to their already overrun shelter?
And then there's the whole "how many members in your family?" "How old are they?" Etc.
However, I've just sidestepped the agencies. (And I am NOT saying the agencies are bad--I'm saying I don't agree with some of the policies). So, if I want an animal, I rarely have to look further than my own neighborhood. One cat was free as a kitten at a garage sale (7 years ago). The other cat was given to us when our aforementioned cat died. One dog was stray and I took him in. The other I rescued from an abusive situation--I found him on www.freecycle.org.
Oh--www.freecycle.org is FANTASTIC for free stuff, btw. Animals, furniture, whatever.
M
September 14, 2007 at 1:19 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
PJean (anonymous) says...
"Denying ownership to someone deserves an explanation."
It would be nice if a reason would be given so if the person applying could change whatever it was that got the application turned down. However; most of the time the explaination is that there are more qualified applicants. I actually went through this with an organization out of Oklahoma over a puppy adoption. The representative of the rescue organization made up her mind that I was not a qualified applicant when she willfully misread and misconstrued my email I had sent about their adoption policies. She was wrong. But she was in charge of the organization so she got to call the shots. So I went to a different organization and was readily approved to adopt my little Boston. It was worth the wait. You do have the right to use other organizations for adoption if you are unsatisfied with the results of an adoption process. The key thing here is that each organization has their own process. SO many unwanted adoptible animals out there and many, many choices of organizations who are arranging homes for them. The Buck Fund is one, and I have heard , up until now; no complaints about how they handle their adoptions.
September 14, 2007 at 3:07 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ACO (anonymous) says...
MelissaE "Outdoors = natural habitat for all animals, duh." Do really believe that with all the roads and vehicles that this outdoors is a natural habitat for animals? wow we disagree on that. I want my furbabies to be safe, warm and loved.
September 14, 2007 at 3:27 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
KristieR (anonymous) says...
I don't see one instance of anyone stating that euthansia is a great thing and should be done more often. In fact, most people here are stating that it would have to be done LESS often if the adoption rules weren't so strict.
Yes, it's a lifelong (of the animals) commitment into a family, and most people I know take it seriously. I have a friend/neighbor whose home is over-ridden with animals she has rescued from the garbage landfill and strays. She has one barn cat (with a kitten) that she would have altered if she could catch it. It's feral and she can't get within 5 feet of it without fear for her life. Do you consider her an irresponsible PET owner? Believe me, this cat is no pet. Coyotes should be afraid of it.
September 14, 2007 at 3:42 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
KristieR (anonymous) says...
Oh and cats were outdoor animals for centuries before people started putting cars on roads. Yes, the outdoors is their natural habitat. It is for dogs too....that's why they have FUR.
September 14, 2007 at 3:43 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ACO (anonymous) says...
KristieR- Did you read your own statement? Before people put cars on the road, do you really feel animals are safe running the sreets? Well I guess you would have a wake up call if you had my job, I have to scoop your dead pets off the road. Sometimes when people think they are rescuing animals their heart is in the right place and they take in too many, but they are overwhelmed by the cost of food and vet care and at that point the animal suffers by not getting proper care. There are too many adoptable animals out there to have one that you fear might hurt you or someone eles. Have you seen the rabies stats for kansas in the last few years? Look at KU site and see how many were cats. We had a 2 young boys bit by feral cats in the last 3 years, one we trapped and had tested, one boy had to take the rabies vaccine. I wouldn't wish that one anyone.
September 14, 2007 at 4:46 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
KristieR (anonymous) says...
ACO - Yes, I can read my own statements. I am quite literate, thank you.
I've never had an animal hit by a vehicle. My cat is an indoor cat only because the previous owners declawed it. It's not safe outdoors because of the other wildlife, not the cars.
The barn cat my friend has was not adopted, it just showed up in her barn one day. Do you actually think she should try to capture it (and risk getting bitten/rabies) or do you recommend she just kill it somehow?
And, I never said to let dogs run the streets, they can fair very well outdoors/penned. As far as cats go, I get the feeling most cats would rather live a few years allowed outdoors vs 15 years cooped up in a house with no freedoms. If my cat could talk he'd say "open this damn window so I can go eat that bird".
Animals would be much better equipped to handle the outdoors if people hadn't decided to breed them into toys. They were meant to hunt in packs, sleep outdoors and howl at the moon.
September 14, 2007 at 5:48 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ACO (anonymous) says...
Well irgnorance nevers seems to be very far away. People can disagree and still be civil, but I guess not you Kstrebuchet, There are a lot of responsible pet owners and wonderful people in this world, not just me :-). No I don't think you would donate money. Donations come from people who really care about the welfare of these animals. We do not live in the stone ages and we domesticated these animals, therefore it is OUR responsibility to protect them. I as an ACO work for the city, I get no donations. I will never be an irresponsible uneducated pet owner. Yes you are sarcastic. I do not see all and know all. Learning is a wonderful thing and I hope I continue to learn everyday. KristieR if my cat would talk- she would say: thanks for keeping me safe and fed and warm, but most of all thanks for the love. My dogs would tell you we love our indoor home, you can get a fur coat and sleep outdoors if you like, but we like our warm comfy beds. This really is not about differences of opinions, it is about lets help these animals who need forever homes. As far as that ferel cat who may hurt someone animal control should be called to trap the cat before it does hurt someone. HSUS is a really good website, never hurts to educate yourself. These pets deserve to have quality care, a quality live, proper vet care and LOTS and LOTS of LOVE.
September 14, 2007 at 8:43 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Heartland_Rescuer (anonymous) says...
Comments forwarded from a very experienced rescuer PART I: STAY TUNED FOR PART TWO :-)
September 14, 2007 at 9:18 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Heartland_Rescuer (anonymous) says...
PART TWO: STAY TUNED FOR PART 3
September 14, 2007 at 9:24 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Heartland_Rescuer (anonymous) says...
PART 3: Check out this article on the Web: AND YET AGAIN - STAY TUNED FOR MORE!
September 14, 2007 at 9:27 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Heartland_Rescuer (anonymous) says...
CONTINUED ARTICLE: <What is Responsible Dog Ownership?
Responsible Dog Ownership means being the best owner/caregiver to your dog that you can be. Much more than "food, water, and shelter", Responsible Dog Ownership is the obligation dog owners have to incorporate their dogs into the community, being a good neighbor, and providing for the needs of their dogs, however varied those needs may be.
Responsible Dog Ownership Means:
• Realizing that a pet is for LIFE, and dedicating yourself to the life of your dog
• Putting the effort into proper care of your puppy (proper veterinary care, vaccinations, de-worming, proper feeding)
• Learning all you can about proper feeding, making healthy choices
• Investing in proper health care throughout your dog's life
• Training your dog through gentle means to be a good canine citizen
• Training your dog not be a nuisance, and helping him achieve that goal
• Teaching your children to respect animals and not abuse them through play (this is also Responsible Parenting)
• Obeying the laws set for your protection and the protection of others, even when your dog "doesn't need a leash". By not obeying the laws, you are only ruining it for everyone else
• Not breeding your dog because he is "so cute"
• Coming to terms with the fact that not everybody likes dogs, and asking yourself, what can you do to ensure that your dog is likable, even to them? Practicing the answer
• Doing your part to help the pet overpopulation problem and keeping your intact dog at home and away from other intact animals, or neutering him or her to prevent future health issues
• Teaching other humans how to interact with your dog
• Providing your dog with a family and a home, not just food and shelter. Dogs are very social, and isolation from the family will result in an unhappy, and ultimately, unhealthy dog
• Holding yourself, as the dog owner, liable for whatever damage your dog does, and taking steps to rectify it
In a world where dogs are increasingly seen as "evil" and "vicious", Responsible Dog Ownership is the only thing that will keep Man's Best Friend where he should be: at our sides.
Sources & More Suggested Reading:
http://dogs.about.com/cs/rescue/a/aa0...
http://www.ncbr.org/info/adoption_fee...
http://www.canismajor.com/dog/alltopi...
http://dogs.about.com/cs/newtodogs/a/...
(I PROMISE I'M DONE :-)
September 14, 2007 at 9:29 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ACO (anonymous) says...
You so point fingers, I don't have a problem with people having different opinions. In fact thats a democracy. I am how ever passionate about how animals deserve the best care and home they can get. You are quick to call names and place blame everywhere but in your own back yard. When an animal comes to animal control shelter or a rescue group it is almost always their last chance for a furever home. It is up to us as shelter/rescue personel to make sure they get the best possible home. I am sorry if some of you do not meet the requirements, but we are not going to let these animals down.
September 14, 2007 at 9:29 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ACO (anonymous) says...
Heartland_Rescuer I love you and I hope they get it!!! Our furbabies are lucky to have you!!! Thanks for all you hard work!!! We will make a difference someday. I will check out the websites you listed_ it is always good to learn!!!
September 14, 2007 at 9:35 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ACO (anonymous) says...
yes I agree, deep down I think we all really just want these pets to have a wondrful, forever home. I Thank you too Heartland_Rescuer you do have way with words and I wish I could speak like that. you made a difference today.. SMILE and know we both listened.
September 14, 2007 at 10:29 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
BuckFundStaff (anonymous) says...
Based on the incredible response to the article we felt that an official response should be posted from the Buck Fund. This is a lot of information, so we apologize in advance for the length.
Explanation of shelter types:
The Buck Fund is a “limited admission licensed shelter/rescue operation”. This means that when our foster homes are full, we can no longer accept pets into foster care until quality adoptions on existing pets are made. Our first priority is to pets residing in “open admission” municipal shelters, because these are usually the pets on death row. We pull from shelters first, owner surrenders second. Stray animals must be filtered through the municipal sheltering system because rescue/foster groups do not have the ability to quarantine diseased animals and cannot risk infecting our very valuable foster homes with feline leukemia, feline AIDS, or Parvovirus. If one of our foster homes is infected, we cannot use that home for new pets for three months until we are certain all remnants of the deadly viruses are gone. The only pets the Buck Fund has ever had to euthanize in its 12 some years of existence are pets that were so ill that we could not rejuvenate them even with the very best veterinary care, or pets that were deemed by professional counsel “very aggressive with low odds for successful rehabilitation”.
To further explain the type of shelter we are we will add that the Emporia Animal Shelter is an “open admission licensed municipal shelter”. Open admission means that for the community they serve they openly accept all pets being surrendered by their owners or incoming strays, at all times. Usually city-funded operations are deemed “high kill facilities” at no fault of their own but because the incoming demand and the limited housing space requires they kill in order to make room for the continuing onslaught of unwanted pets.
September 15, 2007 at 12:40 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
BuckFundStaff (anonymous) says...
The Buck Fund Foster/Adoption Process:
As pets enter our foster care, they receive complete veterinary services. Dogs receive (complete well check, spay/neuter, DA2PP vaccinations, Rabies vaccinations, Bordatella vaccinations, fecal testing and worming, heartworm testing and treatment if positive, Heartgard and Frontline preventatives). Cats receive (complete well check, spay/neuter, FVRCP vaccinations, Rabies vaccinations, FELV/FIV testing, fecal testing and deworming, and preventatives (Revolution, etc.) These are very costly services and on average we spend approximately $200 plus on every animal in our care.
Once fully vetted the pets are posted online to www.buckfund.petfinder.com unless we already have a pre-approved applicant on file searching for that particular kind of pet. If we match an incoming pet with an already approved applicant, that applicant is given first chance to adopt the pet. Otherwise, we leave the pets biography posted online until we receive a good sampling of applications. Those applications are then forwarded to an adoption committee made up of one board officer, one foster caregiver, and one staff member. The committee reviews the application, the required veterinary reference, and the results of the home site check. After that review the applications are placed in order from 1 to 5 (with 1 being the premium applicant). We then schedule a meet/greet with the potential adopter and the pet. If the meeting goes well and the new owner and their current pets all mesh well… The Buck Fund fostered pet goes home on trial with the new owner for one week, they complete the trial adoption contract, and pay the adoption fee which are held during that one week trial. If all is perfect at the end of the week, the contract and check are processed.
September 15, 2007 at 12:42 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
BuckFundStaff (anonymous) says...
The adoption process from a foster/rescue organization is a competitive process because we have to be certain we have selected the very best home for our very deserving rescued pets. It is part of our mission to be certain that the pet’s new home is the very best home we could locate, because this is a pet’s second chance at a good life, and we do not take that responsibility lightly. The adoption fee for a rescue group’s pet can range from $50 to $300 depending upon the costs involved in vetting that particular pet, the age, general health condition etc.. The adoption fee is not for the purchase of a dog or cat, but it helps us pay the veterinary bills incurred on each of our adoptable pets. In 2006, our veterinary bills and adoption program costs were over $31,000.00. We would be happy to share an audited financial statement (upon request) showing the income from adoption fees vs. the expense incurred on the pets.
The adoption process from a municipal shelter is not a competitive process, and is usually based on the first application received for a pet. Municipal shelters do not typically have the manpower or volunteers to perform extensive reference checking or home site checks to determine suitability of the home. Adoption fees are usually less from a municipal shelter because the pet has not received the extensive vet work that rescue groups available pets have. Therefore, when you adopt from a municipal shelter, you are still responsible for paying for the veterinary services as well as the adoption fee.
Minimum Standard of Care Required to be approved to adopt from the Buck Fund:
1. All vaccinations for current pets are up-to-date.
2. Preventative meds are being used (Heartgard/Frontline or Revolution)
3. All current pets must be spayed or neutered OR if not, the applicant is given the opportunity to get the surgery done and re-apply to adopt, or provide a statement from their veterinarian stating that the pet cannot reproduce due to medical issues.
4. A fenced yard for dogs is required, and we prefer to adopt dogs to homes that will make them an indoor companion with plenty of outdoor exercise.
5. We only adopt cats to indoor homes.
September 15, 2007 at 12:43 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
BuckFundStaff (anonymous) says...
Reasons for these minimum standards of care:
1. Vaccinations – Seeing a puppy or dog die of Parvovirus is a terrible thing, we do not want to expose our healthy adoptable pets to a possibly diseased companion.
2. We require preventatives because we have seen the terrible death associated with Heartworm infestation. A needless tragedy because with preventatives on a monthly basis the dogs need not have died.
3. We require all pets be spayed or neutered because we are looking for those pet owners with a high social consciousness realizing that if pets are intact they can reproduce and are only adding fuel to the fire of pet overpopulation which continues to cause an overwhelming demand for intake on the Buck Fund and the Emporia Animal Shelter. This requirement also exists because we have researched and found that pets that are sterilized live longer, healthier lives, & typically have better temperament than unsterilized pets. This requirement is set based on scientific and hard data research provided by the KSU School of Veterinary Medicine and the UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, the Humane Society of the United States, and the ASPCA.
4. We require indoor homes for our dogs and fenced yards because dogs don’t know they aren’t supposed to chase cars. We do adopt to apartment dwellers if we feel absolutely certain that the pet will be kept on-leash or taken to the dog park to play for exercise in a safe fenced environment.
5. We only adopt cats to indoor homes, because they have been raised in foster care as house pets. This actually prevents your pet cat from “being expensive coyote food”.
The H.Dale Buck Animal Welfare Fund board members and staff spent months researching and taking continuing education courses through the Executive Leadership Program sponsored by the Humane Society University in California. We have modeled our organization after very successful rescue groups and shelters across the nation. We have taken the information we have acquired and set our “Benchmarks of a Good Shelter” if you will.
September 15, 2007 at 12:45 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
BuckFundStaff (anonymous) says...
Benchmarks of a Good Shelter (ASPCA):
The first indication of a good animal shelter is mandatory sterilization of all animals. This includes both male and females, mixed breed as well as purebred animals. No responsible shelter will adopt animals without making provisions for their sterilization. Ideally, all animals leaving a shelter should be sterilized prior to entering their new homes. The revolving door syndrome of adopting out one animal only to get back six of its offspring at a later date is patently self-defeating.
Additionally, a good shelter will:
1. Work diligently to place as many animals as possible into responsible, loving, and permanent homes. Shelter workers know that adopting animals without a comprehensive consultation all too often means placing animals into homes that are temporary at best.
2. Distribute a variety of educational materials on proper pet care, animal behavior issues, and pet overpopulation. These references will be disseminated not only to those people adopting or giving up pets, but to the general public through community education and outreach programs.
3. Have hours that are convenient to the most people possible.
4. Have a comprehensive health care program that includes both treatment of sick animals and preventative inoculations and medication.
5. Insure that the animals in its care are as clean, dry, and comfortable as possible.
6. Aim to reduce stress for the animals in its care through grooming, exercise, behavioral enrichment, separation of species, and providing general tender loving care.
7. Have friendly, inviting staff that is willing and able to assist the public.
A good sheltering system is not merely content to deal with animal problems in the community after the fact. A good shelter should be involved in all aspects of animal care and pet ownership and should aim to educate people about animals. In short, a shelter’s job is to get people to see the consequences of their actions so that animal suffering is prevented.
A very good friend to the Buck Fund has said, “Rescue work is like trying to empty the Cottonwood River with a bucket.” We have our buckets, and are bailing as fast as we can, but without community support and the spaying and neutering of all companion animals the City of Emporia will continue to be bombarded with unwanted dogs, puppies, cats, and kittens. So we beg the citizens of our fair city to please “Prevent a litter and fix your critters!”
September 15, 2007 at 12:47 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
BuckFundStaff (anonymous) says...
TO "create":
In response to your complaint about the doggie door conversation... I'm not sure who you spoke with but the adoption committee understands fully that people must work to support themselves and their pets. There are accommodations that can be made for the pets of folks who work full time. We do not deny adoption to anyone because they work full time. In some special cases, if a dog has separation anxiety, we will do our best to place the dog with a home that is semi-retired or only works part time. We do not require a doggie door in order to adopt. All adoption inquiry and requests should be directed to buckfund@cableone.net or the main office # 343-3377.
September 15, 2007 at 12:59 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ACO (anonymous) says...
Buck Fund you are doing a fantastic job in helping these pets. KEEP UP THE GREAT JOB and thanks for all the educational info!!! I belive we all learned today.
September 15, 2007 at 1:56 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
JFThill (anonymous) says...
Foster families are only a temporary fix. They need to go to a furever home as soon as possible. I have 4 dogs, and I don't mind fostering, but I cannot keep them indefinately. Also my sister did adopt from the dog pound several years ago in Pratt and it had parvo and died. This was heartbreaking to her and extra monies trying to save it. Dog pounds do not vet check and vaccinate dogs. This is why the Buck Fund and Rescue Groups are the best to adopt from. I could not be a foster mom if the dogs were not checked and vaccinated because I would not want my babies to get any diseases. I feel safe in fostering for the Buck Fund.
September 15, 2007 at 10:29 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
MelissaE (anonymous) says...
ACO, maybe we should start providing shelters for all the cattle and horses that actually live outside, too? I mean, we wouldn't want any "furbabies" to be cold, right?
Or are those animals expendable?
Maybe we should bring all snakes indoors, too. I see lots of dead snakes all over the place. Actually, I probably see more dead snakes on the road(s) than I do dogs and/or cats.
To the BuckFundStaff: I agree with Kstrebuchet. If at least 40% of the posters here disagree with some of the rules, maybe they need to be revised. I actually don't understand why the rules couldn't be applied on a case by case basis instead of covering EVERY animal and EVERY adoption. Everyone has different circumstances.
Please don't take that to mean that I don't think the Buck Fund isn't doing good things every day. :)
Melissa
September 15, 2007 at 11:27 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
JFThill (anonymous) says...
Now I think you are getting carried away talking about cattle, horses, and snakes. Or are you just trying to rattle ACO? Stick to the issues, they are important on both sides.
September 15, 2007 at 11:37 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ACO (anonymous) says...
let you consonance be your guide. I personally wouldn't want a cow, horse or reptile in my house,although there are people who have reptiles for pets and some people have barns for their livestock. Rescue groups pull a lot of those animals out of the shelter before they are killed, vet them and put them in foster care so they can find a forever home. Foster care homes are a temporary loving home. I believe the Buck Foundation does adoption on a case by case basis. But the rules are in place for the animal to get the best care and the best home.
September 15, 2007 at 12:11 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
create (anonymous) says...
I'm behind you, trebuchet. Buck Fund Folks: As far as the doggy door situation, I know what I experienced with this woman. It was a Saturday morning. Maybe she was sick because she coughed a lot, maybe a cigarette cough, it matters not. She was adamant about a doggie door and a fenced yard and who was going to watch the dog while I was at work. She made me feel like a stupid little kid and kept repeating the rules and requirements. She became so rude and was not civil at all. Who needs it!!!
While I have your attention, I saw a Travel Channel program on Alaska this afternoon. They spent a great deal of time with some people who breed and raise sled dogs, all kinds of breeds. The dogs are fed a high caloric diet and special vitamins, which they of course need for sled racing. The dog yard is hard pan, and each dog is tied to a small doghouse with a chain that looks to be only about four or five feet long. It reminded me of how fighting roosters are kept. I'm guessing it is to prevent the dogs from using up too many calories by running around. But I did not see one dog inside the house.
Now tell me, what about those people? Their customers are Iditarod participants who want to buy dogs that are well bred and healthy. Those dogs aren't running around in a grassy back yard.
Again, I'm sure you Buck Funders are trying your best to prevent cruelty and over-population, but some of your rules are overkill.
Right now, I'm up to my ears in cats that come into my yard to do their business and kill the songbirds that I feed and water. Now THAT really makes me mad because people are letting their cats roam, and not one has a tag.
September 15, 2007 at 6:09 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ACO (anonymous) says...
create Those dogs are bred for that climate. People do breed working dogs. I don't think they would put a chihuahua in that situation ( I hope). I really don't believe that the program you watched on TV was wanting to adopt out companion pets. As for your cat situation_ call animal control,. Cats and dogs are required to have a rabies vaccination and a city tag. Although very few places have leash laws on cats, they are requied to have tags.All states have regulations for breeders and there are good breeders in this world as well as bad( like puppy mills).
September 15, 2007 at 6:45 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
BuckFundStaff (anonymous) says...
To Melissa E> Cattle and Horses are livestock, not domesticated companion animals. There are appropriate standards of care published for livestock by the Association of Veterinary Medicine. The Buck Fund has still been willing to help when needed with livestock. In the last 60 days we actually fostered a pony seized by Lyon County Animal Control who was suffering from neglect. One of our foster homes fostered the pony, we applied for a grant from the Emergency Animal Rescue Service to cover his surgery needed, and the Buck Fund paid the bill on all vaccinations he needed. Not only that but our foster family paid for all his grain and feed until he could be adopted.
September 15, 2007 at 7:38 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
BuckFundStaff (anonymous) says...
To Kstrebuchet> Regarding Buck Fund Dog Park. This park is a City of Emporia Recreational Facility and the rules posted at the park were selected by the City of Emporia officials.
DOG PARK RULES
• Dog owners are liable for any injuries or damage caused by their dogs.
• Dogs must display current city license and rabies vaccination tags.
• Puppies under 4 months of age are prohibited.
• Dogs should be spayed or neutered. Female dogs in heat are prohibited.
• Aggressive dogs are prohibited.
• Remove any pinch, prong, or spiked collars before entering the play area.
• Dogs should be leashed upon entering and exiting the staging area.
• Please do not enter the play area with your dog leashed.
• Dog owners must be in control of and in visual contact with their dogs at all times.
• Dog owners must clean up after their pets.
• No more than 3 dogs per owner.
• Children under 12 years of age must be under strict adult supervision.
• Rawhides, food (dog or human) and glass bottles are not permitted.
• No smoking in the park area. Cigarette butts are harmful to dogs if swallowed.
Most responsible breeders would know better than to bring a female dog in heat to a public dog park..... Rules were posted by the City of Emporia, and as with anything else people do not always comply, especially with picking up after their pets. That is why the Buck Fund provides two volunteers once per week to patrol the park with a big scoop and rake to keep the park as clean as possible for folks to enjoy.
September 15, 2007 at 7:47 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
create (anonymous) says...
Man alive, you people get off on rules.
September 15, 2007 at 7:52 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
BuckFundStaff (anonymous) says...
To Kstrebuchet> Sorry for the additional post regarding the dog park, but also wanted you to know that the Buck Fund Dog Park Users Group raised over $16,000 to bring this pet-friendly recreation to Emporia along with spending over one year working with city officials to bring the dream to reality. We also continue to provide all of the mutt mitts at the park for easy cleanup which costs an additional $800 per year. The dog park group will continue to raise funds to bring some much needed additional amenities to the park such as additional park benches, picnic tables and some much needed landscaping as well. I really hope that you have taken time with your loyal companion to go enjoy the free running, romping and playing with other dogs :-)
September 15, 2007 at 7:52 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ACO (anonymous) says...
A world without rules would be total chaos.
September 15, 2007 at 8:03 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
BuckFundStaff (anonymous) says...
To Kstrebuchet, create, Melissa E or others regarding shelter adoptions:
The Buck Fund daily encourages residents to not only look at our adoptable pets, but also the Emporia Animal Shelter (EAS) pets. We literally refer people to EAS on a daily basis. We WANT more EAS pets to get adopted, and we hope that their new families will work with their veterinarians to provide a recommended schedule of care - including sterilization. Keep in mind that there is no such thing as a "free pet", these pets still need to be wormed, vaccinated, HW tested and treated if positive, and spayed or neutered - which will cost approximately $175- $225 depending on where they get the vetting done. The Buck Fund also handles all of the pet of the week advertising for the EAS adoptable pets. When those adoptable pets get put on the "put to sleep" (PTS) board, the shelter manager calls us and we go to work. We either at that point transfer them into our foster care, or begin working other no-kill rescue group foster organizations across the country. We have moved EAS shelter dogs as far as Atlanta GA to save their lives. We also transport weekly with an organization called the Colorado Animal Rescue Express, Inc. (CARE). Every two weeks as we have pulled adoptable pets from EAS, we board them, vet them, and then secure licensed foster homes long the I-70 Corridor for them to get into a safe foster environment until they can be adopted. We have been able to literally double the number of municipal animal shelter pets saved by networking with this reputable group. We not only help the Emporia Animal Control system, but also Burlington Animal Control, Madison Animal Control, Yates Center Animal Control, Chanute Animal Control, and KC MO Animal Control. Many times we will do courtesy postings on our internet site for these those municipal shelters so that their pets can get some airtime in another community where there might be more interest in adopting them. Our services are a compliment to the city animal control operations. When they run out of time there, the only option they have is for us to step in and go to work because there were not enough homes for all of the unwanted pets.
September 15, 2007 at 8:11 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Firecracker (anonymous) says...
To "create" > I think the staffperson said "the city of emporia selected the rules to be posted at the dog park".
AND p.s. > Do you really live in a world with no rules? Don't you have to report to work at a certain time? Do you not have a job description, that if you do not perform to a certain standard - you get fired? ETC.....
Are you going to say "nanna nanna boo boo" next?
September 15, 2007 at 8:19 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
BuckFundStaff (anonymous) says...
I forgot to mention that "The Big Fix Program" was established by the Buck Fund in 2006 to help defray the high cost of spay and neuter surgeries for families who cannot afford the procedure for their pets. This applies to residents who have existing pets or pets adopted from the Emporia Animal Shelter. Through the Buck Fund those pets can get spayed or neutered for a flat fee of $45. This low-cost spay/neuter program is a year round program offered to residents of Lyon, Chase, Greenwood, Morris, and Coffey counties. The goal of the program is to reduce pet overpopulation, but also over a period of time reduce the intake demand on the Emporia Animal Shelter.
September 15, 2007 at 8:56 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
BuckFundStaff (anonymous) says...
To Kstrebuchet> The staging area is inside each vestibule area. (small dog side) (large dog side). You step inside the vestibule(entrance to park) - it is a "double gated" area to prevent pets from slipping out accidentally. Once inside the first gate, you unleash your pet, than let the pet through the second gate into the main dog park area. Professional dog trainers instructed us that dogs will meet less aggressively off-leash for the first time.
Unaltered pets are allowed in the dog park as long as the female dog is not "in season".
September 15, 2007 at 9:03 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
BuckFundStaff (anonymous) says...
Kstrebuchet > There is not a fine involved if the pets entering the dog park are unsterilized. There are citations and fines issued if a dog aggressively attacks another dog in the city park and the owner presses charges against the other dog's owner.
September 15, 2007 at 9:07 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
BuckFundStaff (anonymous) says...
To Melissa E> I re-read the blog and saw that I had not answered one of your questions. We do consider adoption applications on a case by case basis. There are certain care standards that are not negotiable, but in the case of the "current pets must be spayed/neutered", you might go back and read where we give the applicant the choice to schedule spay/neuter for their current pet in order to qualify. We HAVE DONE adoptions where the applicant chose to do this and they did adopt one of our dogs. In another case, we had an excellent application, but the pet they currently had was to elderly to be spayed, and the owner provided a written statement from their veterinarian. Once again, this pet owner adopted one of our dogs. We've also had instances where the applicant did not have a veterinary reference because this was their first pet as an adult. We do special responsible pet ownership education using articles provided by HSUS and ASPCA and have adopted many pets to first time pet owners. Since 2005, our adoption rate has increased briskly each year. In 2007, we are well on our way to exceeding the 2006 adoption rates.
Overall, the Buck Fund is doing the best that we can for the animals in our care. We do not receive any government or taxpayer funding. We operate with a limited number of volunteers, a budget, and the resources that we have available at any given time. We understand that we cannot please every person, and for that we express regret. We have received wonderful feedback from previous adoptive families, and we do our best to make decisions based on the best interest of the pets in our care.
September 15, 2007 at 11:54 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
JFThill (anonymous) says...
I am so glad you are done. Too bad you couldn't stick to the issues. I have learned a lot here, but not from you. You just like to rile people. Hope you had fun. Maybe if you had been mature and stuck to the issues instead of putting in your little snides there wouldn't have been 90 posts. Thanks ACO and Buck Fund for all the informative information.
September 16, 2007 at 6:57 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Firecracker (anonymous) says...
To Kstrebuchet > It was nice to see that you can be professional and not attack other posters on other story forums, but apparently this issue really hit home with you. Wonder why that was? Too bad you cannot be professional and courteous on this thread.
September 16, 2007 at 11:03 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ksfarmer (anonymous) says...
There are some personality types that are just what they call "poop-stirrers" . These people have nothing better to do than gossip, and trying to cause trouble or conflict. I see several of those people on this thread.
Thank God that the Buck Fund is in Emporia, because without them alot of shelters would have to kill more homeless pets.
Everyone one is entitled to their opinion. You know what they say about opinions. There like............., everybody has one. People shouldn't get so angry when they are not chosen to adopt - it has happened to all of us with various different organizations. Just move on, adopt a pet from somewhere and save a life.
GROW UP! Act like your mothers taught you all manners in grade school.
September 16, 2007 at 11:20 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ACO (anonymous) says...
I was never representing the Buck Foundation as a staff member, merley supporting their requirements for adoption. My statements and opinions come from my experience in shelters and as an animal control officer. I was not directly pointing a finger at you or anyone eles on this thread, but if the shoe fits. THANK you Buck Foundation and to all of you that care to help and unwanted pet.
September 16, 2007 at 11:34 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Heartland_Rescuer (anonymous) says...
To Kstrebuchet?> It actually did not take 90 posts for the Buck Fund to answer your questions on the one rule you disagreed with. Look back into their FIRST POST (9/15) at 12:43 a.m. It stated rather clearly there that there were options to the rule. I figure they have better things to do than keep responding to your hate mail.
September 16, 2007 at 11:34 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Church_of_doG (anonymous) says...
JMO>for all who wonder why "recycled" pets aren't free....
Animals with no value often are treated that way. Free dogs often become bait for fighting dogs, and free kittens often become python food.
I like to think of pets as luxuries, similar to cars. Food=gas, yearly shots=license plates, flea prevention etc.=oil changes, grooming=car wash, medical emergencies=car wreck.......
Can't afford it? Don't have one.
Sunday Service over from the Church of doG......JMO
September 16, 2007 at 11:37 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
create (anonymous) says...
Whoa! Whoa! Whoa! trebuchet has tried to explain him/herself from the very beginning and even rephrased the question regarding spaying/neutering. But then inflammatory phrases from Buck Funders began: "HANG IN THERE ONE DAY WE WILL GET THESE PEOPLE EDUCATED," and "Just remember: there's a cure for ignorance, and it's called education, but there's no cure for stupid." That's the kind of crap I was getting on the phone call I experienced that Saturday morning I mentioned before. It seemed the more questions I asked, the more heightened the person's temper became until she was just all out rude and finally said that I couldn't have a dog, period. Like the dog Nazi. No dog for you! Dang!!!
September 16, 2007 at 11:38 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
lisag (anonymous) says...
WOW
100 posts!!! Just shows ya how passionate people are about their pets!!!!
September 16, 2007 at 11:52 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Denise_Dorcey (anonymous) says...
The purpose of this article was to inform the public the Buck Fund needs more foster homes to pets to meet the need. I would like for this thread to end (not necessarily with me), on that focus and on a positive note.
In my opinion, the Buck Fund is a wonderful organization. I praise Dorothy Matile for having the foresight and fortitude to begin this program.
Any organization, program, or individual is going to have those that disagree with or do not like the guidelines put in place. There will be those who do not like how a particular individual implements those guidelines. This is the way the world works and everyone has a right to not like things.
However, let us not detract from the good work programs like the Buck Fund and Emporia Animal Shelter provide this community. Overall, both programs offer services preferable to not having any service at all for homeless animals, in my opinion.
September 17, 2007 at 9:38 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
jackslap (anonymous) says...
They should have this strict of breeding laws for humans! God bless Texas....
September 17, 2007 at 3:12 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
PetAdvocate (anonymous) says...
To the Buck Fund and all the Rescue Groups and ACO's - When you care it make a difference. By caring and looking out for the well being of these pets and helping to educate, we are making a difference. Keep It Up. Tail Wags to You
September 17, 2007 at 7:30 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )