The life and death of the electric car
Diana Staresinic-Deane
Saturday, August 4, 2007
“Who Killed the Electric Car?,” distributed by Sony Pictures Classics, released on DVD November 2006; new to Emporia Public Library in 2007, www.whokilledtheelectriccarmovie.com, $19.99.
Many viewers may not realize that a century ago electric cars dominated the roads. They were quiet, smooth and could be charged at home, whereas gas-powered vehicles required cranking and fuel, and produced exhaust.
Yet by the 1920s, gas-powered vehicles won out thanks to cheaper oil, automatic starters and mass production. Electric-powered vehicles remained on the fringe of the automotive industry until 1990, when California passed the Zero Emission Vehicle Mandate. California told the automotive industry that if they wanted to continue to sell cars in the Golden State, a percentage of their vehicles had to produce zero emissions.
Enter GM’s EV1, which hit the California freeways in 1996. Marketed through Saturn, the EV1 was sleek, sexy and quiet. It reached 100 miles on a single charge and required virtually no maintenance beyond having the tires rotated and the washer fluid topped off. What’s more, because it required no gasoline, it achieved California’s goal for a zero-emissions vehicle.
Many Californians were excited about the EVI and momentum for electric vehicles grew as Ford, Honda and Nissan released their own EVs. Public charging stations were built across the state. As the EV became visible on the streets, waiting lists at dealerships grew.
Yet less than 10 years later, aside from a handful of automobiles that escaped to the relative sanctuary of museums and university engineering programs, the EV was wiped off the face of the earth.
As compelling as any murder mystery, writer and director Chris Paine’s documentary tells the story of the rise and fall of both the EV and California’s zero emissions vehicle mandate. Who was to blame for the failure of these programs? Paine develops a list of seven suspects: consumers, EV batteries, oil companies, car companies, hydrogen fuel cells, the California Air Resources Board and the federal government. Through interviews with dozens of lawmakers, auto industry execs, engineers and drivers, Paine builds a case that will probably leave many viewers wondering just who or what is driving the development of better vehicles and legislation.
The opening sequence of a funeral procession for the EV1 seems over the top at first, but as the story of the EV1 and its fan base unfolds, it’s hard not to mourn for the little car. What’s more, after watching footage of the stylish little EV1 zipping along California freeways, this viewer found herself wishing she could drive one.
ChuckNorris (anonymous) says...
The EV1 was horrible. Its a great concept and yes it would be nice but why would I want to drive an electric Geo? phh...stylish....lame.
August 5, 2007 at 1:11 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
dpaschoal (anonymous) says...
Back in 1995 I have joined the race to comply with CARB's mandate with a project of an ideal five-seats commuter car with the length of a Smart for two, very safe, comfortable and affordable. It could reach 100 miles range even using plain good lead acid batteries and compete with conventional cars on the freeway. In addition, besides many other advantages on safety, maneuverability, economical manufacturing and novel distribution system, it would have power-pack containers running on rails, which could be be exchanged in seconds at any recharging/dispensing/collecting fully automated station (also part of the project).
This project has been constantly upgraded with the latest technologies with the input of many engineers who are working for the big-three in
Detroit. It was considered unique and technically feasible also by a panel of DOE's FutureCAR and Advanced Automotive Technologies in Washington, DC.
I have contacted a few professors of Toronto University who are interested on assigning senior students to help on developing the design in order to produce a prototype to compete with the multi-million dollars X-Prize Automotive Competition set for 2009.
I am now looking for companies and investors interested in the project.
Yours truly.
Roberto DePaschoal
info@ev-motion.com
www.ev-motion.com
August 5, 2007 at 11:18 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
EVangel (anonymous) says...
I drove a GM EV1 in early 2000. It was wonderful; It beat everything away from stoplights during my visit to Los Angeles, and there were a hundred public charging spaces throughout the city.
I became an EVangel (EV advocate) as soon as GM told me that I could not buy an EV1 and I learned that none of the eight electric vehicle (EV) models built in the 1990s were available for purchase. Ford later offered its slow-moving Ranger EV (for $40,000) and Toyota rapidly sold out a few hundred similarly-priced RAV4 EVs in 2002 , but I never got a chance to own the best of the lot - the GM EV1.
Anybody who says the EV1 was 'horrible' never drove one.
August 6, 2007 at 5:13 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
bdprotheroe (anonymous) says...
"Times, they are a changing," as the old saying goes.
Okay, I agree, we won't see hybrid cars dominating the U.S. market anytime soon. Yet, these hybrid cars are all over the roads in California's urban centers because they are easier on the pocket books and better for the environment. And, they are smaller; in San Francisco, finding a parking spot can bring you to tears (literally), so the smaller the better.
Perhaps these cars are not exactly "sexy" in style, but the look has taken a back seat to the other important and promotable factors as noted above.
Which hybrid car is most popular? The Toyota Prius can be found everywhere, most certainly: http://www.toyota.com/prius/ American automakers need to focus on the concept, or else I fear they will continue to be "eaten alive" by foreign automakers.
Brian Protheroe
San Francisco, CA
August 6, 2007 at 5:43 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )