For six months, some of President Trump’s most implacable foes have invested great hope in two Republicans — former Rep. Joe Walsh and former Massachusetts Gov. William Weld — who are challenging the president for the GOP nomination. Could they do some damage to Trump’s re-election prospects?

In the Iowa caucuses, that hope was put to a first test. It failed.

In the state’s Republican caucuses — yes, there were Republican caucuses, and they ran smoothly, unlike the Democratic contest — the Walsh and Weld candidacies fizzled.

In the end, Trump won 97.15 percent of the vote, to Walsh’s 1.08 percent and Weld’s 1.31 percent. Others — write-ins of various people — totaled 0.47 percent. It was a striking show of strength for the president.

Beyond that, turnout was high for a year in which an incumbent president is assured of renomination. In 2016, about 180,000 Republican voters turned up for Iowa caucuses. But that was a highly competitive year in which Trump battled Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush and a number of other candidates. The last time there was a non-competitive GOP race, that is, a race with an incumbent president, was in 2004, when President George W. Bush was in the White House. That year, about 8,000 Republicans showed up for what were essentially meaningless caucuses.

This year, the turnout was 32,320, an impressive number for an incumbent year.

Delighted state GOP officials owed a lot to the president’s decision to make a serious effort in Iowa this caucus season. First, he visited Des Moines and held a rally last Thursday; it was far bigger than any event staged by any Democratic candidate. Then, Trump sent more than 80 surrogates to the state, including his two sons, a slate of Cabinet members, Republican congressmen and GOP governors. Then, the Trump campaign stepped up its social media work in the state.

The reason was not that Trump was afraid of Walsh or Weld. The reason was that Trump was trying to strengthen support in Iowa, a swing state won by Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012, so that it will be in the Trump general election win column before Democrats even pick their candidate.

Organizers of the caucus in Ames, home to Iowa State University, hoped that perhaps 100 people would show up. And that was with the participation of one of the campaign’s star surrogates, presidential son Donald Trump Jr. As it turned out, 449 people showed up to vote, and another 80 or so came just to watch what was going on.

By and large, the attendees did not merely like the president; they loved the president.

”I think he’s doing a great job,” Rod Kern said.

“I am thrilled with him,” Paula Anderson said.

”Best president we’ve ever had, outside of Reagan, maybe,” Bob Folkmann said.

“I hope people are telling you they are so excited about our president,” Joyce Hoffman said. (They were.)

“I’m so on for Trump,” Andrea Hrbek said. “I have not loved a Republican president like Trump.” Hrbek explained that she voted for Bush, McCain and Romney, but today feels a bit embarrassed by each vote. Not so with Trump.

And so on.

At caucuses, representatives of each candidate are supposed to have a little time to tell the audience why they should vote for that candidate. In Ames, Trump Jr. was the star of the show, talking for more than 20 minutes about his father’s accomplishments, and also dwelling on the investigations to which Democrats have subjected Trump and his family.

Jeff Ortiz, the co-chair of the Story County GOP, went from table to table, asking people if anyone would like to make remarks on behalf of Walsh or Weld. There were no takers.

In the end, out of 449 votes, Trump received 415, Walsh 20 and Weld 9. There was one write-in each for a disparate group: Vice President Mike Pence, former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley, Nebraska Sen. Ben Sasse and Dispatch Writer David French. One person abstained.

In the end, Ortiz was delighted with a turnout more than four times what he originally expected. Yes, that was a display of clout by Trump, but it was also an organizational shot in the arm for the local party.

“It’s critical that we get these people to turn out, to sign up for our central committees, to stay involved right up until the end,” Ortiz said. “Because there are no guarantees come November.”

As good as the result was for the Trump team, it was at best a discouraging outcome for the Never-Trump challenge. In late January, former Weekly Standard Editor Bill Kristol pleaded on Twitter: “Iowa Republicans: Caucus for Joe Walsh or Bill Weld or uncommitted. You’re better than Donald Trump. Don’t stoop to support this man so unworthy of your support.”

Iowa Republicans ignored the entreaty, and many others that came before it.

Now the campaign is on to New Hampshire. As in Iowa, Trump plans a rally in the state before the primary. Again there will be surrogates, and again there will be stepped-up online campaigning. The result could be another difficult night for the quixotic Republican effort to stop the president.

— Byron York is chief political correspondent for The Washington Examiner.

(8) comments


You Know, One day you'll turn around an Watango will be there, And then you'll wish you hadn't wasted so much time being angry


Gary I'll bet you $1000 Trump gets re elected put you luekert where your money is or your mouth . one or the other


POOR POOR Gary , always the victim, What did they do to you Gary? wait what's that? Oh another $29 I get this hour thanks to Our President

Gary Lukert

This is a Stupid Column. Those two people, good people...were never going anywhere. I did not nor will not read beyond the headline.

burn'n daylight

And I did read it, finally something positive about my President...


Yes finally. It's just too bad this positive thing doesn't really mean anything. Maybe the next time he does a positive thing will be better than beating two people nobody has talked about for months. Now if we could just keep him from packing all the negative things in between the rare positive thing, I would say the Republicans have a viable candidate for 2020, but our President just fired all witnesses against him along with their FAMILIES. That is what dictators like Kim do.

I remember when Republicans were "outraged" about heads being on pikes if they voted against Trump? Wonder how Republicans will react now that heads are being put on pikes? Saaad. Saaaaad. Saaaaaaaaad! No Obstruction lol.


So if you are the boss an one of your employees lies about you in a report an it is found not to be credible would you still keep that employee on in a sensitive position where he could do it again

Gary Lukert

Your President's a CROOK, a LIAR, a CHEAT! Has had Sex many times OUTSIDE OF Marriage. He's a Thug!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.