IMG_20200.jpg

USD 253 Associate Executive Director of Assessment and Accountability Ryan Karjala speaks to the USD 253 Board of Education Wednesday evening.

The Emporia Public Schools Board of Education reviewed a detailed report on “chronic absenteeism” during a brief meeting Wednesday evening at the Mary Herbert Education Center.

In USD 253 schools, chronic absenteeism is defined as “missing 10 percent or more days of school, for both excused and unexcused reasons.” So far, during the 2019-2020 school year, about 16.6 percent of K-12 students — a total of 699 individuals in total — have met the criteria. The figure fell in line with 2018-2019 numbers, when about 19.5 percent — a total of 846 students — were considered chronically absent, which was about 5 percent above reported state averages.

“These incidents fall outside of activities and sports, because when you’re participating in those, you’re still technically in school,” said USD 253 Associate Executive Director of Assessment and Accountability Ryan Karjala. “This data covers when students miss school with unexcused absences due to skipping class or when students miss school because of sickness or family-related issues … These numbers are just a snapshot in time. So hopefully, with some of the initiatives we’re trying to do, we’ll be able to bring these numbers down.”

According to Karjala, the district is attempting to address attendance problems by identifying their root causes on a case-by-case basis in order to prevent further academic issues. He went on to define some of the most common reasons for missing school into two main categories: aversion — which can involve factors such as academic and social struggles, bullying, ineffective or exclusionary school discipline or undiagnosed disabilities — and disengagement — feelings of which can be brought on by lack of culturally engaging or relevant instruction, lack of meaningful relationships, a poor “school climate” or lack of motivation due to a shortage of earned credits.

“Students that are missing classes on a regular basis tend to miss those college benchmarks on state assessments, too,” Karjala said. “It’s not a huge percentage below the benchmarks — about 2 percent on average — but if that consistent lack of attendance continues throughout a student’s entire educational career, those percentages can start to build up.”

So far, several district schools have attempted to meet this goal with use of outside sources, such as Communities in Schools support staff, which currently serve at William Allen White, Logan Avenue and Walnut elementary schools as well as the high school. The district has also begun using a program called EduClimber, which provides a list of chronically absent students that is automatically sent to principals on a weekly basis.

“The [system] isn’t to the level we want it at yet, but we’re working toward that … teachers can also see attendance numbers when they log in, which has also been helpful.” Karjala said. “We’re also working very hard on our school redesigns, so our curriculum is more engaging and meaningful to students that might not see the value in attending classes.”

Moving forward, Karjala said one of the district’s main goals would be to “support the social-emotional development of the educational community” by developing strategies to promote healthy relationships, enhancing the sense of security students feel in their learning environment and emphasizing a ‘whole student’ approach to teaching.

“It’s great that we can see the programs we already have are sort of dovetailing nicely to address the problem, but there’s obviously still a lot we can do,” said Board President Art Gutierrez. “Knowing the numbers and having those tools to address the issue going forward is really something that’s going to start making a difference if we in the district keep at it.”

In other business, board of education members also:

• Accepted a $20,000 donation from the Hopkins Foundation and a $25,000 donation from Jones Foundation to continue funding of the Dual Credit Scholarship Program at EHS.

• Accepted a $527.61 donation from the Riverside PTO to the Riverside Elementary music program for the purchase of instruments.

• Signed a memorandum of understanding with Greenbush Southeast Kansas Education Service Center to again provide a driver education program in Emporia.

• Agreed to dispose of the following through online auctions: 16 laptop computers, four desktop computers, five monitors, 103 network access points, six network switches, 120 hard drives and a tablet.

(6) comments

Comment deleted.
Aim_High

Hannah,

You've already stated you are only capable of voting for candidates with an (R) after their name. You don't think for yourself. You are the poster child of indoctrinated. You also changed your attempt at an insult from Plantation to Reservation. Your brain is starting to slip sweetie. Happy Valentines Day.

Aim_High

Hold the parents responsible. If kids are missing more than 10% of school days, their parents should step up and make sure they get there. Getting the police involved with enforcing truancy laws should be a last resort, not the go-to solution or replacement for bad parenting.

SnowGypsy

Isn't the district familiar with truancy laws? Kansas has them. I don't remember reading anything about a parent's responsibility to see that their children are attending school. Here is the statute addressing it: http://www.kslegislature.org/li_2012/b2011_12/statute/072_000_0000_chapter/072_011_0000_article/072_011_0013_section/072_011_0013_k/

Aim_High

Do we really need a law that says it is a parent's responsibility to see that their kids go to school? I always thought my kids were my problem, not the governments, but I guess that's just one more place we disagree. Parents should raise their children, not leave it up to the schools/courts to do for you.

SnowGypsy

There have been truancy laws on the books in at least most states, not sure about KS, for decades, so obviously, they do need the laws. Seriously, everybody should be aware that not all parents actually "parent". The laws should be enforced which will guide the parents to either solve the problem with their child or end up in front of a judge trying to explain away their inability to get their child to school. I brought up the truancy laws because it looked like the school's thought was to coddle the truant individual, "Oh, poor baby............." Get their butts to school, because the taxpayers don't need anymore slackers! The article makes it obvious that the parents aren't doing their jobs, thus the truancy laws being in place. Not sure who are disagreeing with - the laws? Want to lock up the parents if they aren't parenting? I'll agree to that.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.